Neil Palmer

My feedback

  1. 95 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  4 comments  ·  SQL Data Warehouse » Table Structure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Neil Palmer supported this idea  · 
  2. 201 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    started  ·  19 comments  ·  SQL Data Warehouse » Polybase  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Neil Palmer supported this idea  · 
  3. 54 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Data Lake  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Neil Palmer supported this idea  · 
  4. 7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Azure portal » Resource management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Neil Palmer supported this idea  · 
  5. 26 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Azure Analysis Services  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Neil Palmer supported this idea  · 
  6. 15 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  7. 89 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  8. 47 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  9. 160 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    10 comments  ·  SQL Data Warehouse » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Neil Palmer supported this idea  · 
  10. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    started  ·  0 comments  ·  SQL Data Warehouse » Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Neil Palmer shared this idea  · 
  11. 198 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  13 comments  ·  Data Lake  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Neil Palmer commented  · 

    Shouldn't this be updated to in progress / done?

    I'm loving the support for ADLS in the latest version of azure storage explorer.

    👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍🎉🎉🎉

    Neil Palmer supported this idea  · 
  12. 181 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  14 comments  ·  Data Lake  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Neil Palmer commented  · 

    I would love to be able to have a Tableau or Power BI model over the ADLA catalog. Whilst it may not be super speedy, it would suddenly open up ADLA as a warehouse solution that the business can easily use.

    This would be especially useful for scenarios where reports are only viewed rarely, but may take lots of resource to run - this would save huge amounts of money on not having to run overnights, but run queries on demand. This would also allow us to get some of the features offered by rival solutions that can charge per query in an ansi sql environment.

    Neil Palmer supported this idea  · 
  13. 17 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Neil Palmer supported this idea  · 
  14. 26 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Upvotes: 47

    <=-=Jul 3 2014 10:03AM=-=>

    This would definitely be a good build. I walked through an initial investigation of clustered columnstore on one of our data sets, and the number of reads was reduced by about 80% for some queries in the workload once I started paying careful attention to segments and loading data in a single-threaded manner to optimize segment elimination. However, this results in slower loading of data, and it would be great to be able to create columnstore indexes in order for segment elimination.

    Having an optional ORDER BY clause for the columnstore initial creation, removing the need to first create a clustered index in order to control order and allowing parallelism without breaking order, would be particularly powerful.

    <=-=Jul 3 2014 10:30AM=-=>

    Neugebauer: thanks. you identified the issue correctly. This is something we are actively looking. One question
    (1) once the index is build, the…

    Neil Palmer supported this idea  · 
  15. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  SQL Data Warehouse » Table Structure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Neil Palmer shared this idea  · 
  16. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  SQL Data Warehouse » T-SQL  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Neil Palmer shared this idea  · 
  17. 100 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  3 comments  ·  SQL Data Warehouse » T-SQL  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Neil Palmer supported this idea  · 
  18. 3,858 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    161 comments  ·  Storage » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for the feedback! We are interested in collecting feedback on this request – please vote for it if this is something you like to see.

    We’re also interested in learning more what people want to use the SFTP/FTPS for and which protocol they prefer. Please feel free to leave us a comment letting us know more detail!

    Thanks,

    Will Gries
    Program Manager, Azure Files

    Neil Palmer supported this idea  · 
  19. 26 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Upvotes: 81

    <=-=Aug 5 2014 8:28AM=-=>

    As far as I understand the current (SQL Server 2014) implementation of the Batch Mode, the Delta-Stores are already being processed in Batch Mode which means that the algorithm per se is already able to work with a b-tree HEAPs (Row Storage).

    <=-=Mar 3 2017 9:38AM=-=>

    Nico,
    I’m working on this feature right now. It won’t make the next version, but I’d really like to talk to you about what use cases you see for it. There is more to the work than just enabling the optimizer to consider batch mode plans over a rowstore.
    I’ll start an offline conversation about some of the particulars.
    Kevin

    Neil Palmer supported this idea  · 
  20. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Neil Palmer shared this idea  · 
← Previous 1 3

Feedback and Knowledge Base