Tomasz Jagusz
My feedback
-
41 votesTomasz Jagusz
supported this idea
·
-
130 votes
Hi, we have planned to add support for this feature soon.
Tomasz Jagusz
supported this idea
·
-
1,077 votes
Thank you for the feedback, we are reviewing this feature request.
Tomasz Jagusz
supported this idea
·
-
54 votesTomasz Jagusz
supported this idea
·
-
41 votes
Thanks for the feedback – this scenario makes sense and we’re working on figuring out how to enable this
An error occurred while saving the comment Tomasz Jagusz
supported this idea
·
-
65 votes
The below is still accurate, but updating to better reflect product backlog. Keep the votes coming.
-Colby
Tomasz Jagusz
supported this idea
·
-
107 votes
This is currently on our radar and is now planned work. Thanks for voting!
- Cary, Azure Functions
Tomasz Jagusz
supported this idea
·
-
122 votes
Still unplanned, but please keep the votes coming!
Tomasz Jagusz
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesTomasz Jagusz
supported this idea
·
-
4 votes
There is no plan to address this issue.
Thanks,
-MatteoTomasz Jagusz
supported this idea
·
-
7 votes
Upvotes: 94
<=-=Sep 5 2016 6:18AM=-=>Teams working with SSMS solutions for ad-hoc T-SQL code also require the ability to integrate those solutions with TFS
<=-=Nov 4 2016 8:54AM=-=>This issue needs to be addressed. Integration with some sort of source control solution – including Visual Studio Team Services and Git – is something that should be available in every Microsoft Developer Tool.
<=-=Nov 4 2016 11:47PM=-=>I agree with both previous posts, The SDLC requirements of many of the consulting gigs I have worked require that my SQL Dev work be included in existing Source Control repositories. I am primarily working with SSMS solutions and this has always been a pain point for me. Now that some companies are using the GitHub repository it feels even harder to maintain the SQL code without a nice Msft plugin to help.
Even with the previously available MSSCCI Provider which allowed…
Tomasz Jagusz
supported this idea
·
-
4 votes
Upvotes: 2
<=-=Jun 20 2008 2:27PM=-=> harolds,Thank you for the suggestion. I will send a notification to the feature team to keep tracking of this suggestion.
Regards,
<=-=Aug 22 2008 11:49AM=-=>
Eric Kang
Program Manager, Microsoft SQL ServerHarold is a colleague of mine. It just seems strange to us that all SQL related source control is done at a SQL script level instead of an actual object level within SQL Server itself. You should be required “check-out” a stored procedure, for example, before you can ALTER it. If you “Undo check-out” then the object should be restored to it’s previous state.
Tomasz Jagusz
supported this idea
·
-
7 votesTomasz Jagusz
supported this idea
·
-
194 votes
Upvotes: 1
Tomasz Jagusz
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Tomasz Jagusz
commented
any updates?
-
58 votes
Upvotes: 25
<=-=Feb 7 2017 7:34PM=-=>Yes! I myself a use heavily inline table value functions and that would improve the clarity of their use even more!
<=-=Mar 5 2017 2:48PM=-=>We understand the requirement, and it is good that it gets a lot of votes in very short period. It is in out backlog and we will consider it for some of the next releases; however, currently we cannot confirm when it will be implemented..
<=-=Dec 22 2017 3:17PM=-=>This would be quite incredibly useful. When it was added to C#, it was a “so-what?” thing for me at the time – but now, I don’t know how I ever coded without named parameters. It has saved me countless hours getting things right the first time, and not chasing around dumb problems. I am sure the same would be true if SQL Server supported named parameters in User-Defined Functions.…
Tomasz Jagusz
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Tomasz Jagusz
commented
I agree with @Steven. default keyword shouldn't be required.
Named parameters would be awesome, but top priority should be removing of that default keyword - it isn't needed when You call a function with execute so why do You need it when You use function is select? -
112 votes
Filters are in our roadmap. Filters will be tied to Consumer Groups.
Tomasz Jagusz
supported this idea
·
-
370 votes
I think we’ll be able to do this in ARM (new portal) at some point. Keep voting for it! I want to do this too.
Tomasz Jagusz
supported this idea
·
-
335 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Tomasz Jagusz
commented
Any updates on this? It's almost two years since this was marked as planned.
Tomasz Jagusz
supported this idea
·
This is a must-have! I need to know the client IP address to add some rules to .htaccess