Tomasz Jagusz

My feedback

  1. 41 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Azure IoT (Hub, DPS, SDKs)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tomasz Jagusz supported this idea  · 
  2. 130 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    14 comments  ·  Azure IoT (Hub, DPS, SDKs)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tomasz Jagusz supported this idea  · 
  3. 1,077 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    19 comments  ·  Web Apps » App Service Environment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tomasz Jagusz supported this idea  · 
  4. 54 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  3 comments  ·  API Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tomasz Jagusz supported this idea  · 
  5. 41 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    13 comments  ·  Azure Container Instances  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Tomasz Jagusz commented  · 

    This is a must-have! I need to know the client IP address to add some rules to .htaccess

    Tomasz Jagusz supported this idea  · 
  6. 65 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Azure Functions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tomasz Jagusz supported this idea  · 
  7. 107 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Azure Functions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tomasz Jagusz supported this idea  · 
  8. 122 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    15 comments  ·  Azure Functions » Feature  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tomasz Jagusz supported this idea  · 
  9. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tomasz Jagusz supported this idea  · 
  10. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  SQL Server » Bugs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tomasz Jagusz supported this idea  · 
  11. 7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Upvotes: 94

    <=-=Sep 5 2016 6:18AM=-=>

    Teams working with SSMS solutions for ad-hoc T-SQL code also require the ability to integrate those solutions with TFS

    <=-=Nov 4 2016 8:54AM=-=>

    This issue needs to be addressed. Integration with some sort of source control solution – including Visual Studio Team Services and Git – is something that should be available in every Microsoft Developer Tool.

    <=-=Nov 4 2016 11:47PM=-=>

    I agree with both previous posts, The SDLC requirements of many of the consulting gigs I have worked require that my SQL Dev work be included in existing Source Control repositories. I am primarily working with SSMS solutions and this has always been a pain point for me. Now that some companies are using the GitHub repository it feels even harder to maintain the SQL code without a nice Msft plugin to help.

    Even with the previously available MSSCCI Provider which allowed…

    Tomasz Jagusz supported this idea  · 
  12. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Upvotes: 2

    <=-=Jun 20 2008 2:27PM=-=> harolds,

    Thank you for the suggestion. I will send a notification to the feature team to keep tracking of this suggestion.

    Regards,
    Eric Kang
    Program Manager, Microsoft SQL Server

    <=-=Aug 22 2008 11:49AM=-=>

    Harold is a colleague of mine. It just seems strange to us that all SQL related source control is done at a SQL script level instead of an actual object level within SQL Server itself. You should be required “check-out” a stored procedure, for example, before you can ALTER it. If you “Undo check-out” then the object should be restored to it’s previous state.

    Tomasz Jagusz supported this idea  · 
  13. 7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  SQL Server » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tomasz Jagusz supported this idea  · 
  14. 194 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    33 comments  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tomasz Jagusz supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Tomasz Jagusz commented  · 

    any updates?

  15. 58 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Upvotes: 25

    <=-=Feb 7 2017 7:34PM=-=>

    Yes! I myself a use heavily inline table value functions and that would improve the clarity of their use even more!

    <=-=Mar 5 2017 2:48PM=-=>

    We understand the requirement, and it is good that it gets a lot of votes in very short period. It is in out backlog and we will consider it for some of the next releases; however, currently we cannot confirm when it will be implemented..

    <=-=Dec 22 2017 3:17PM=-=>

    This would be quite incredibly useful. When it was added to C#, it was a “so-what?” thing for me at the time – but now, I don’t know how I ever coded without named parameters. It has saved me countless hours getting things right the first time, and not chasing around dumb problems. I am sure the same would be true if SQL Server supported named parameters in User-Defined Functions.…

    Tomasz Jagusz supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Tomasz Jagusz commented  · 

    I agree with @Steven. default keyword shouldn't be required.
    Named parameters would be awesome, but top priority should be removing of that default keyword - it isn't needed when You call a function with execute so why do You need it when You use function is select?

  16. 112 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    10 comments  ·  Service Bus  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tomasz Jagusz supported this idea  · 
  17. 370 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Service Bus  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tomasz Jagusz supported this idea  · 
  18. 335 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  17 comments  ·  Service Bus  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Tomasz Jagusz commented  · 

    Any updates on this? It's almost two years since this was marked as planned.

    Tomasz Jagusz supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base