We’re continuing to investigate options for adding this support. There are technical challenges to overcome in order to make this happen. We thank you for all your valuable comments so far, and welcome any additional feedback you have on what are the most important use cases involved with these scenarios.VHAM supported this idea ·VHAM commented
We need nested groups to organize our devices. Nesting dynamic groups are even more necessary since we cannot provision device groups in Azure. Automated and self-service processes are limited and greatly increases administration overhead and user down time. Explicitly assigning applications to device groups is very tedious especially with limited iOS attributes leveraged by dynamic group memberships. We have 30 various departments across 48 sites with organizational, site, department and program budgets. We have over 30 thousand devices with hundreds of apps. We have months invested attempting to replace AD provisioning (leveraged in other MDMs) using dynamic groups . Please work on nesting dynamic device groups and all dynamic groups.