Update: Microsoft will be moving away from UserVoice sites on a product-by-product basis throughout the 2021 calendar year. We will leverage 1st party solutions for customer feedback. Learn more here.


My feedback

  1. 11 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Upvotes: 178

    <=-=Apr 13 2007 1:31PM=-=>

    Dear Michael

    Thanks for the feedback. We will be looking into your suggestion for a future release of SQL Server.

    Best regards

    <=-=Jun 4 2007 1:43PM=-=>

    This would be very useful for our products as well.

    <=-=Aug 26 2008 8:55AM=-=>

    I just encountered this weird behavior. Although it is valid XML, it makes the resulting document extremely large as well as inconsistent. E.g., the intermediate elements created by the “AS” clause of the subquery don’t have the namespace declaration. I vote for a fix.

    <=-=Sep 17 2008 8:20AM=-=>

    I also think this should be changed. It makes the XML very difficult to read!

    <=-=Jan 29 2009 12:09AM=-=>

    The current function realy bloats the returned XML, we’ve used the “old-school” for xml expicit but the sql to construct that is realy messy.
    We’ve used the xml functionality in SQL server for a…

    ps supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    ps commented  · 

    nearly another 4 years and still waiting.

Feedback and Knowledge Base