Karl

My feedback

  1. 59 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  SQL Data Sync  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Shirley Wang responded

    Thanks for the suggestion! We are evaluating the priority and cost for implementing this.

    Karl supported this idea  · 
  2. 72 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  SQL Data Sync  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Karl supported this idea  · 
  3. 110 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  SQL Data Sync  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Karl supported this idea  · 
  4. 259 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  11 comments  ·  SQL Data Sync  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Karl supported this idea  · 
  5. 601 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    29 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Karl supported this idea  · 
  6. 96 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Karl supported this idea  · 
  7. 139 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  4 comments  ·  Networking » Content Delivery Network  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Karl supported this idea  · 
  8. 628 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    24 comments  ·  Networking » Load Balancer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Karl supported this idea  · 
  9. 1,240 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    50 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    URL rewrite for Application Gateway v2 is currently in public preview! With this, you can now rewrite URL path and query string parameters based on a condition. The condition will be on request or response parameters.

    Also, you get the ability to choose the routing to a backend pool based on the original URL or the rewritten URL.

    We’d love for you to try it out and let us know your valuable feedback. Learn more here – https://aka.ms/urlrewritepreview and https://aka.ms/urlrewriteconfiguration

    Karl supported this idea  · 
  10. 119 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Azure Search » Crawlers  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Karl supported this idea  · 
  11. 7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hey Andrew,

    You can do this today using the probes from within the VMs. I suspect you want to do it directly from the portal in the same way as the probes, yes?

    Corey

    Karl supported this idea  · 
  12. 38 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    planned  ·  8 comments  ·  Azure Migrate  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Karl supported this idea  · 
  13. 34 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Azure Synapse Analytics » SQL/Integration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for voting on this feature. Please describe your scenario in the thread below. We currently have many migration solutions from SQL Server to SQL Data Warehouse such as Azure Data Factory and Redgate through the Quick Load Azure portal experience (link below). If this is a continuous replication process, we’d love to understand your hybrid scenario so please comment below.

    https://azure.microsoft.com/blog/enhanced-loading-monitoring-and-troubleshooting-experience-for-azure-sql-data-warehouse/

    Karl supported this idea  · 
  14. 398 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  7 comments  ·  Cloud Services (Web and Worker Role)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Karl supported this idea  · 
  15. 355 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    9 comments  ·  Cloud Services (Web and Worker Role)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Karl supported this idea  · 
  16. 172 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    15 comments  ·  Azure Synapse Analytics » SQL/Integration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Karl commented  · 

    Just got caught out by this one as well - seems to be a fairly basic failing to not support code first schema management tooling

    Karl supported this idea  · 
  17. 75 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Karl supported this idea  · 
  18. 121 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  Scheduler » Features  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Kevin Lam responded

    Mr. Andersson,
    To be clear, do you mean the retry policy for an HTTP request (which includes the timespan between retries and the number of retry attempts to make)?

    Thanks,
    Kevin

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Karl commented  · 

    We also need the ability on some jobs to set the http timeout longer than the current 60 second default.

    There are also some that we would like to have much shorter as long durations we want to see flagged as an error quickly

    Karl supported this idea  · 
  19. 1,593 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    41 comments  ·  Azure Search » Pricing and Quotas  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Karl supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base