Lajos Marton

My feedback

  1. 1,429 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    56 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lajos Marton supported this idea  · 
  2. 553 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    unplanned  ·  39 comments  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lajos Marton supported this idea  · 
  3. 161 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Upvotes: 72

    <=-=Mar 10 2016 11:26AM=-=>

    It’s a shame that this was submitted as just a “suggestion”. It should actually be listed as a “bug” because there’s only a comparatively small set of use cases where enumeration of the result set of elements is not important.

    <=-=Mar 11 2016 12:47PM=-=>

    I agree that an order column is required; one example use case is where two lists are passed in, and ordinal positions in one list correspond to positions in the other.

    <=-=Mar 11 2016 3:12PM=-=>

    Please see the related suggestion: STRING_SPLIT needs “RemoveEmptyEntries” option, like String.Split in .NET ( https://connect.microsoft.com/SQLServer/feedback/details/2462002/ ).

    <=-=Mar 12 2016 12:02PM=-=>

    This kind of function is primarily needed for de-serializing previously serialized arrays of values of any type format-able as text.
    I therefore recommend to have the result set of this function work excellent with this use-case.

    With de-serialized arrays there is a need to…

    Lajos Marton supported this idea  · 
  4. 181 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Upvotes: 127

    <=-=Jun 23 2015 8:37AM=-=>

    I’m the first to post a useful comment. This must make me special.

    Seriously though, this would be an excellent solution to having to create a new “scratchdb” to hold my interim ETL data. This would be a major plus in simplifying design of a high performance app.

    <=-=Jul 3 2015 5:04AM=-=>

    In 2014, memory optimized tables, and delayed durability can be used help mitigate these Issues. However neither of this are always completely viable solutions. Brent’s proposed solution is likely the simplest way to achieve this with the least amount of unwanted impact. It is important to note that other platforms implement similar functionality as well. Notably Oracle.

    <=-=Nov 29 2016 3:58PM=-=>

    There are so many good things about this suggestion. I am amazed that SQL does not have the capability to turn off logging for certain tables that you define as no…

    Lajos Marton supported this idea  · 
  5. 214 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Upvotes: 8

    <=-=Mar 5 2017 2:42PM=-=>

    Thanks for this idea. This is a valid requirement and I hope that it will get more votes. Currently we cannot confirm when it will be added, but it is in our backlog.

    <=-=May 22 2017 5:03AM=-=>

    would like it very much, particularly since you already have the CONCAT / GREATEST() a variable number of paramenters and does something with it…

    <=-=Jun 5 2017 12:31PM=-=>

    GREATEST / LEAST functions would be fantastic addition.

    <=-=Nov 14 2017 3:42PM=-=>

    The workarounds using CROSS APPLY or CASE expressions are difficult to manage and read. I’d love to see these implemented.

    Lajos Marton supported this idea  · 
  6. 7,109 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    188 comments  ·  Web Apps  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lajos Marton commented  · 

    Hehe, top 2 uservoice is for Let's encrypt and they doesn't care about it.
    By the way, why that two uservoice tickets not merged yet? It would be great to see that 10000 users want Let's encrypt free ssl, and 900 user want the real second uservoice about anything else :D

    Lajos Marton commented  · 

    From one side this is a possible solution. From other side this is a big shame for Azure App Service Team.

    Lajos Marton supported this idea  · 
  7. 9 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  CDN  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lajos Marton shared this idea  · 
  8. 2,590 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    61 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » SQL API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lajos Marton supported this idea  · 
  9. 80 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  3 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lajos Marton supported this idea  · 
  10. 426 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    26 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lajos Marton supported this idea  · 
  11. 423 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    34 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lajos Marton supported this idea  · 
  12. 179 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  Storage » Tables  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lajos Marton supported this idea  · 
    Lajos Marton commented  · 

    My most painful point is the 32Kb limit of property size. If I use it as a key - value store (and why not, actually it is), then I can't use the 1mb row limit, if I have only one key and one value in a row and value must be maximum 32Kb what is very tiny :(

  13. 3,591 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    73 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lajos Marton supported this idea  · 
  14. 412 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    19 comments  ·  Web Apps  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lajos Marton supported this idea  · 
  15. 8 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  0 comments  ·  CDN  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lajos Marton shared this idea  · 
  16. 110 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  CDN  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lajos Marton supported this idea  · 
  17. 587 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    started  ·  11 comments  ·  CDN  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lajos Marton supported this idea  · 
  18. 178 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lajos Marton supported this idea  · 
  19. 721 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    31 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » SQL API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lajos Marton supported this idea  · 
  20. 700 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    started  ·  115 comments  ·  Azure portal » Search + navigation  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lajos Marton commented  · 

    Please at least try the new portal on 1366X768.

    Lajos Marton commented  · 

    I don't have issues with tiles on the new portal, but the horizontal scrolling is a curse. On the other side the whole page is not responsive, I can't work on it with my 1366X768.

    Lajos Marton supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1 3

Feedback and Knowledge Base