Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 41 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 26 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Azure Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    "it is unlikely we’ll address this suggestion in the near future" - why not? This is a fundamental flaw in indexing of documents and results in duplicated content in the output of azure search!

    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  3. 1,309 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    34 comments  ·  Azure Search » Pricing and Quotas  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Hit against this today. Importing a large number of documents for a test run, hit against the individual file limit - went to upgrade the tier to carry (in the same way I would for any other Azure service) only to find this is not possible.

    Can't re-create the index as this would involve re-running my import and indexing which I do not really have time for.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  4. 18 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Azure Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  5. 11 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  (General Feedback) » azure.microsoft.com  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  6. 14 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  7. 33 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  8. 21 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    We need it to work like this. The current experience is terrible UX and not clear to a non technical user

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  9. 1,165 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  36 comments  ·  Azure Search » Client SDK  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  10. 1,068 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    67 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We definitely recognize the popularity of this feature, and we discuss it constantly during the planning phases. However there are certain technical limitations in the system that add a large amount of development cost. Because of the cost and the fact that there is a workaround available, other features get prioritized over this one.

    That being said, please keep voting for it. The popularity of the feature does help bring it up and makes us reconsider every time.

    Apologies for the delay.

    /Parakh


    Old message:
    We’re doing some research both on the specifics of this ask as well as what it would take to support this.
    Is the ask here to do the same thing that regular Azure AD does (see: https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/enterprisemobility/2014/12/18/azure-active-directory-now-with-group-claims-and-application-roles/) or is are there different requirements around this for Azure AD B2C?

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base