Peter Bons

My feedback

  1. 26 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Azure Databricks  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Peter Bons supported this idea  · 
  2. 16 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure IoT Central » Rules  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Peter Bons supported this idea  · 
  3. 25 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure IoT Central » Rules  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hi Uri,

    Thanks for taking the time to provide us with feedback. We’re evaluating how we can accomplish what you’ve outlined above. We’ll post updates here as we determine next steps.

    Thanks,
    Luis on behalf of the Azure IoT Central team

    Peter Bons supported this idea  · 
  4. 8,022 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    201 comments  ·  Web Apps  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  5. 385 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  2 comments  ·  Service Fabric  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Peter Bons supported this idea  · 
  6. 413 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Service Fabric  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Peter Bons supported this idea  · 
  7. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Service Fabric  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Peter Bons commented  · 

    You already do not need to do this. You can use CreateNonIServiceProxy which accepts an interfave that is not inherited from IService, see https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/microsoft.servicefabric.services.remoting.client.serviceproxyfactory.createnoniserviceproxy?view=azure-dotnet

  8. 1,059 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  16 comments  ·  Service Fabric  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Peter Bons supported this idea  · 
    Peter Bons commented  · 

    @Francesc: sure you can use Azure Service Bus or other components but for service to service communication inside the cluster not having to resort to an external component can help de build decoupled services for zero additional costs

  9. 54 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » Change Feed  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  10. 102 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Stream Analytics  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  11. 43 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Service Fabric  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Peter Bons commented  · 

    Take a look at this repo: https://github.com/Expecho/Azure-Service-Fabric-Logging . It shows how to do it yourself.

  12. 51 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Service Fabric  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Peter Bons supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base