Mark Lewis

My feedback

  1. 24 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Mark Lewis supported this idea  · 
  2. 23 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Mark Lewis supported this idea  · 
  3. 25 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Mark Lewis supported this idea  · 
  4. 99 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mark Lewis supported this idea  · 
  5. 168 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    13 comments  ·  Virtual Machines » Windows  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Mark Lewis commented  · 

    This is especially important with the 1709 to 1803 update in particular, along with future twice yearly release cadence upgrades

    Mark Lewis supported this idea  · 
  6. 10 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Mark Lewis supported this idea  · 
  7. 11 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Mark Lewis supported this idea  · 
  8. 32 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Mark Lewis commented  · 

    I'm seeing this on a 1709 server. A lot, Even though the Event Log opens perfectly fine.

    Mark Lewis supported this idea  · 
  9. 30 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » End user experiences  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks so much for the feedback! Customizations of the My Apps portal for both end users and admins are on our roadmap. This includes providing the ability to re-arrange and group apps and as well as using a customizable domain.

    Alongside this, we are looking at ways to expose these capabilities through APIs that allow customers to create their own version that meets their needs.
    Please keep sharing feedback and ideas!

    Mark Lewis supported this idea  · 
  10. 159 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    34 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » End user experiences  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks so much for the feedback! Customizations of the My Apps portal for both end users and admins are on our roadmap. This includes providing the ability to re-arrange and group apps and as well as using a customizable domain.

    We are also looking to see if we can enable embedding other components like widgets. We’re still in process of validating options for this.
    Please keep sharing your feedback and ideas around this!

    Mark Lewis supported this idea  · 
  11. 35 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    10 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » End user experiences  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks so much for the feedback! We know how important it is for users to have the ability to customize their app list and make it very easy to find their core applications.
    Customizations of the My Apps portal for both end users and admins are top priority on our roadmap. This includes providing the ability to re-arrange and group apps and provide users sets of categorized apps.

    Please keep sharing your feedback and ideas around this!

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Mark Lewis commented  · 

    This would be pretty cool to have

    Mark Lewis supported this idea  · 
  12. 367 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Hi folks,
    Just a quick update here. We’re still actively working on support for custom roles (RBAC) across Azure AD. Stay tuned for more announcements in the next couple of months.

    You can have a look at what we’ve shipped thus far (custom roles for application registration management) here – https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/users-groups-roles/roles-custom-overview.

    Regards,
    Vince Smith
    Azure Active Directory Team

    Mark Lewis supported this idea  · 
  13. 2,492 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    496 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » SaaS Applications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We’re currently evaluating an option that will provide the functionality offered by nested groups, but removes the complexity nested groups adds. We appreciate your patience on this ask and want to ensure we deliver a solution that benefits all of our customers. Below are use cases that we’d like for you to stack rank, with #1 being priority for you. We thank you for the continued comments and feedback.

    Use case A: nested group in a cloud security group inherits apps assignment
    Use case B: nested group in a cloud security group inherits license assignment
    Use case C: nesting groups under Office 365 groups

    Mark Lewis supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base