Dan Friedman

My feedback

  1. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Data Lake  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dan Friedman shared this idea  · 
  2. 8 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Azure Functions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dan Friedman supported this idea  · 
  3. 27 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Azure Functions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    This is an awesome idea, and we’re exploring a few options to make it a reality.
    However, the 600 connection limit per instance should be enough for most applications if you’re reusing or closing connections. If you truly need 600 open connections you are likely to run into the 10 minute timeout per execution.
    Even after we add this you will still need to be mindful of your connection management.

    Keep the votes coming!
    —Alex

    Dan Friedman shared this idea  · 
  4. 11 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Data Lake  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dan Friedman supported this idea  · 
  5. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Data Lake  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dan Friedman supported this idea  · 
  6. 9 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Data Lake  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dan Friedman supported this idea  · 
  7. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Data Lake  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dan Friedman shared this idea  · 
  8. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Data Lake  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dan Friedman shared this idea  · 
  9. 11 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dan Friedman shared this idea  · 
  10. 20 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dan Friedman supported this idea  · 
  11. 31 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dan Friedman supported this idea  · 
  12. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Data Lake  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dan Friedman shared this idea  · 
  13. 48 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  3 comments  ·  Data Lake  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dan Friedman supported this idea  · 
  14. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Data Lake  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dan Friedman shared this idea  · 
  15. 18 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  3 comments  ·  Data Lake  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dan Friedman supported this idea  · 
  16. 71 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Data Lake  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    planned  ·  Saveen responded

    This work necessary to support this is in progress.

    Dan Friedman supported this idea  · 
  17. 13 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Data Lake  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dan Friedman shared this idea  · 
  18. 81 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dan Friedman shared this idea  · 
  19. 237 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    36 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for voting on this suggestion. It is now completed and can be done via custom Azure Policy. Here is a sample custom policy to apply a specific tag at the RG and have them inherited by the Resources in that RG: https://github.com/Azure/azure-policy/tree/master/samples/ResourceGroup/copy-resourcegroup-tag

    Tag inheritance for existing resources is something that we plan to add support for in 2019.

    Dan Friedman supported this idea  · 
  20. 3,848 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    130 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Reopening this user voice item as our support for Skip/Take (Offset/Limit) was only limited to single partition queries.

    Update.

    The newly released .NET SDK v3 now includes support for x-partition queries using Offset/Limit. You can learn more about v3 SDK and try it and provide feedback on our github repo here.
    github.com/azure/azure-cosmos-dotnet-v3

    We will also be back-porting this functionality to our .NET v2 SDK. This work will begin shortly and we anticipate it to be released in September.

    Once that is released we will mark this feature as complete.

    Thank you for your patience and votes.

    Dan Friedman supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base