Morrolan

My feedback

  1. 100 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Azure Functions » Bindings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Morrolan commented  · 

    Since this is so easy to support (as was mentioned it was unintentionally working at one point), why is this not implemented already? It is puzzling to me that every resource in Azure has not supported role based authentication from inception.

    Morrolan supported this idea  · 
  2. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Storage » AzCopy  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Morrolan shared this idea  · 
  3. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure Functions » Feature  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Morrolan supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Morrolan commented  · 

    It does seem strange that this is not high priority to have both system/user identities used to authorize between resources in Azure. There is another suggestion here to be able to use managed identity to have the function bind to event hub, and it actually says unplanned? Hopefully that is a miscommunication.

  4. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for the valid suggestion. Your feedback is now open for the user community to upvote which allows us to effectively prioritize your request against our existing feature list and also gives us insight into the potential impact of implementing the suggested feature

    Morrolan shared this idea  · 
  5. 115 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    9 comments  ·  Azure Databricks  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Morrolan supported this idea  · 
  6. 80 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » SQL API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Morrolan supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Morrolan commented  · 

    I ported 40GB data from MongoDB (WiredTiger) into Cosmos DB only to find that the data is using 170GB in Cosmos DB!!! Wow, this goes to 21 partitions which forces a huge RU/s required for performance since the RU/s are distributed to each partition. Can you give an example for using client-side compression library?

  7. 5,073 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    128 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Morrolan supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base