Jacob Møhl
My feedback
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Jacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
520 votesJacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
222 votes
Thanks for your feedback.
Jacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
116 votes
We now support adding Metric charts to our Favorites view.
Would a mobile dashboard option on portal help?
Jacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
760 votes
Thanks for the feedback! We are working on enabling this feature.
Thanks,
JasonJacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
748 votes
Thank you for the feedback. We are investigating this feature request and I will update this status as we progress.
Best,
JasonJacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
2,306 votes
Work is actively underway to add naked domain support with an automatic renewal flow to App Service Managed Certificates. There have been some snags getting the auto-renewal flow working. We understand these kinds of delays are frustrating, but rest assured the feature is being worked on and is coming in the future.
-Azure App Service Team
Jacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
122 votes
Still unplanned, but please keep the votes coming!
An error occurred while saving the comment Jacob Møhl
commented
Very much needed for the transition to serverless apis.
Some key features in a first release could be
- ModelBinding [FromQuery], [FromBody] ect. with ModelState information
- ApiExplorer information for Open API/Swagger generation (ProducesResponseType ect.)Jacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
164 votesunplanned · 25 comments · Azure portal » Resource management · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Jacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
24 votesJacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
20 votesJacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Jacob Møhl
commented
Or at least get a notification of the changes. The same for arrays in query strings, which are converted to strings.
-
11 votesJacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Jacob Møhl
commented
I had i similar finding. Arrays in query strings get converted to strings (which is not the same).
-
99 votesunder review · 0 comments · API Management » Developer portal · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Jacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
1,176 votesunder review · 19 comments · API Management » Developer portal · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Jacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
135 votesplanned · 5 comments · API Management » API management experience · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Jacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
160 votesJacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
656 votes
Please tell us a bit more about scenarios you are trying to enable and how do you see this feature working.
Jacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
678 votes
Hi all – we could really use more information on the use cases you would like us to deliver with this feature. To quote Darrel’s post below:
Are you looking for some kind of UI in the portal to enable developers to subscribe to webhooks exposed by APIs?
Or are you looking for the additional security provided API Management to limit what events a user can subscribe to?
Do you want to correlate the API Management subscription ID with registered webhooks?
Any information you can give about the scenarios you would like help with would be great.Many thanks
An error occurred while saving the comment Jacob Møhl
commented
When talking about webhooks in relation to API Mangement i would like the APIM solution to support management of webhooks, that I as a API developer expose.
So my consumers (3. party who interact with my API) can setup endpoint for my webhook enables APIs would call. This should be done in the API portal by the consumer.
A solution could be that the APIs which use webhooks, could call some endpoint in the APIM and then APIM would delegate this call to who ever has set up a webhook/subscribes.
There for I as a API developer shoould not be concerned about delivery of all webhook calls, only 1 to the APIM solution.
I think much of the comments is about the possibility to get notified (by webhooks) of events happening inside the APIM solution for internal use by the API developer it self.
-
370 votes
Hi there,
We are still waiting on a few internal dependencies before we can complete this request.
Thanks,
OdedJacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
878 votes
this feature has been postponed as it wouldn’t be complete and might be revisited later if standards/supported features by CAs and browsers change (double wildcard certificates are not supported standard, resulting in no way to secure double wildcard domain)
Jacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
This should either be supported or documented what other tools should be used (Azure SQL Data sync or ?)