Jacob Møhl
My feedback
-
316 votes
We have started work to enable this. We discuss the approach and implementation some during our webcast last month at about minute 25 here: http://aka.ms/azurefunctionslive
—Colby
Jacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
17 votesJacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
Jacob Møhl
commented
Or at least get a notification of the changes. The same for arrays in query strings, which are converted to strings.
-
9 votesJacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
Jacob Møhl
commented
I had i similar finding. Arrays in query strings get converted to strings (which is not the same).
-
74 votesunder review · 0 comments · API Management » Developer portal · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Jacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
161 votesunder review · 2 comments · API Management » Developer portal · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Jacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
111 votes
Thanks for the feedback – be great to get continued input on this. Keep the votes coming!
Jacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
115 votesJacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
320 votes
Please tell us a bit more about scenarios you are trying to enable and how do you see this feature working.
Jacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
569 votes
Hi all – we could really use more information on the use cases you would like us to deliver with this feature. To quote Darrel’s post below:
Are you looking for some kind of UI in the portal to enable developers to subscribe to webhooks exposed by APIs?
Or are you looking for the additional security provided API Management to limit what events a user can subscribe to?
Do you want to correlate the API Management subscription ID with registered webhooks?
Any information you can give about the scenarios you would like help with would be great.Many thanks
Jacob Møhl
commented
When talking about webhooks in relation to API Mangement i would like the APIM solution to support management of webhooks, that I as a API developer expose.
So my consumers (3. party who interact with my API) can setup endpoint for my webhook enables APIs would call. This should be done in the API portal by the consumer.
A solution could be that the APIs which use webhooks, could call some endpoint in the APIM and then APIM would delegate this call to who ever has set up a webhook/subscribes.
There for I as a API developer shoould not be concerned about delivery of all webhook calls, only 1 to the APIM solution.
I think much of the comments is about the possibility to get notified (by webhooks) of events happening inside the APIM solution for internal use by the API developer it self.
-
83 votes
Hi, This scenario is currently unsupported, you can move your app between resource groups but you can’t move it to another app service plan if the destination app service plan is in a different resource group than the source resource group, even if both app service plans are on the same scale unit.
We are currently investigating how we can add the support for such scenario, and we will share any updates.Ahmed (App Service Team)
Jacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
566 votes
Thank you for your patience on this item, we are still looking at how to solve the outstanding request to retry when we get a 5xx response from the worker. We will update when there is something concrete.
Thanks,
OdedJacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
322 votes
Hi there,
We are still waiting on a few internal dependencies before we can complete this request.
Thanks,
OdedJacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
408 votes
this feature has been postponed as it wouldn’t be complete and might be revisited later if standards/supported features by CAs and browsers change (double wildcard certificates are not supported standard, resulting in no way to secure double wildcard domain)
Jacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
6,649 votes
We are looking at options to enable this.
Jacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesJacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
601 votes
-
270 votesunder review · 11 comments · API Management » Developer portal · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Jacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
Any news from the team. Would it be ASP.Net Core like or?