Jacob Møhl
My feedback
-
81 votes
Great ask. Keep the votes coming. Nothing planned short term.
-
JeffJacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
90 votesunplanned · 17 comments · Azure portal » Resource management · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Jacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
17 votesJacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
17 votesJacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
Jacob Møhl
commented
Or at least get a notification of the changes. The same for arrays in query strings, which are converted to strings.
-
9 votesJacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
Jacob Møhl
commented
I had i similar finding. Arrays in query strings get converted to strings (which is not the same).
-
83 votesunder review · 0 comments · API Management » Developer portal · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Jacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
463 votesunder review · 7 comments · API Management » Developer portal · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Jacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
122 votesplanned · 5 comments · API Management » API management experience · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Jacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
132 votesJacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
455 votes
Please tell us a bit more about scenarios you are trying to enable and how do you see this feature working.
Jacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
625 votes
Hi all – we could really use more information on the use cases you would like us to deliver with this feature. To quote Darrel’s post below:
Are you looking for some kind of UI in the portal to enable developers to subscribe to webhooks exposed by APIs?
Or are you looking for the additional security provided API Management to limit what events a user can subscribe to?
Do you want to correlate the API Management subscription ID with registered webhooks?
Any information you can give about the scenarios you would like help with would be great.Many thanks
Jacob Møhl
commented
When talking about webhooks in relation to API Mangement i would like the APIM solution to support management of webhooks, that I as a API developer expose.
So my consumers (3. party who interact with my API) can setup endpoint for my webhook enables APIs would call. This should be done in the API portal by the consumer.
A solution could be that the APIs which use webhooks, could call some endpoint in the APIM and then APIM would delegate this call to who ever has set up a webhook/subscribes.
There for I as a API developer shoould not be concerned about delivery of all webhook calls, only 1 to the APIM solution.
I think much of the comments is about the possibility to get notified (by webhooks) of events happening inside the APIM solution for internal use by the API developer it self.
-
344 votes
Hi there,
We are still waiting on a few internal dependencies before we can complete this request.
Thanks,
OdedJacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
443 votes
this feature has been postponed as it wouldn’t be complete and might be revisited later if standards/supported features by CAs and browsers change (double wildcard certificates are not supported standard, resulting in no way to secure double wildcard domain)
Jacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesJacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
652 votes
-
362 votesunder review · 15 comments · API Management » Developer portal · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Jacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
Very much needed for the transition to serverless apis.
Some key features in a first release could be
- ModelBinding [FromQuery], [FromBody] ect. with ModelState information
- ApiExplorer information for Open API/Swagger generation (ProducesResponseType ect.)