Jacob Møhl
My feedback
-
17 votesJacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
9 votesJacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
Jacob Møhl
commented
I had i similar finding. Arrays in query strings get converted to strings (which is not the same).
-
77 votesunder review · 0 comments · API Management » Developer portal · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Jacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
239 votesunder review · 3 comments · API Management » Developer portal · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Jacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
114 votes
Thanks for the feedback – be great to get continued input on this. Keep the votes coming!
Jacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
122 votesJacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
361 votes
Please tell us a bit more about scenarios you are trying to enable and how do you see this feature working.
Jacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
578 votes
Hi all – we could really use more information on the use cases you would like us to deliver with this feature. To quote Darrel’s post below:
Are you looking for some kind of UI in the portal to enable developers to subscribe to webhooks exposed by APIs?
Or are you looking for the additional security provided API Management to limit what events a user can subscribe to?
Do you want to correlate the API Management subscription ID with registered webhooks?
Any information you can give about the scenarios you would like help with would be great.Many thanks
Jacob Møhl
commented
When talking about webhooks in relation to API Mangement i would like the APIM solution to support management of webhooks, that I as a API developer expose.
So my consumers (3. party who interact with my API) can setup endpoint for my webhook enables APIs would call. This should be done in the API portal by the consumer.
A solution could be that the APIs which use webhooks, could call some endpoint in the APIM and then APIM would delegate this call to who ever has set up a webhook/subscribes.
There for I as a API developer shoould not be concerned about delivery of all webhook calls, only 1 to the APIM solution.
I think much of the comments is about the possibility to get notified (by webhooks) of events happening inside the APIM solution for internal use by the API developer it self.
-
86 votes
Hi, This scenario is currently unsupported, you can move your app between resource groups but you can’t move it to another app service plan if the destination app service plan is in a different resource group than the source resource group, even if both app service plans are on the same scale unit.
We are currently investigating how we can add the support for such scenario, and we will share any updates.Ahmed (App Service Team)
Jacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
591 votes
Hi everyone,
Use Proactive Auto Heal to set up rules (such as for high HTTP 500 errors) and actions (such as restarting the instance).
https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/appserviceteam/2017/08/17/proactive-auto-heal/
Jacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
334 votes
Hi there,
We are still waiting on a few internal dependencies before we can complete this request.
Thanks,
OdedJacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
410 votes
this feature has been postponed as it wouldn’t be complete and might be revisited later if standards/supported features by CAs and browsers change (double wildcard certificates are not supported standard, resulting in no way to secure double wildcard domain)
Jacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
6,966 votes
We are looking at options to enable this.
Jacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesJacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
-
625 votes
-
293 votesunder review · 12 comments · API Management » Developer portal · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Jacob Møhl
supported this idea
·
Or at least get a notification of the changes. The same for arrays in query strings, which are converted to strings.