Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 185 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    started  ·  15 comments  ·  API Management » API management experience  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 416 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    The ability to rename databases and collections is not currently something that is in our road map.

    Currently the way to accomplish this task in Cosmos DB is to create a new collection with the changed name then use bulk exec or change feed to populate it.

    Thanks for your request and input on this. We may consider this for a future planning cycle.

    thanks.

    Anonymous commented  · 

    How is this BASIC functionality not available 2+ years later from the original post?

  3. 623 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    75 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Due to various technical limitations, the first iteration of the customer-owned domains functionality will not be available for a few more months. We will provide an update as soon as we can get a more specific ETA.

    If you are looking to use custom domains to use javascript, we are now looking to enable that experience by providing a new (non-customizable) domain. Please look for updates here: https://feedback.azure.com/forums/169401-azure-active-directory/suggestions/15493536-add-support-for-javascript-inside-the-custom-ui-br

    /Parakh

    Anonymous commented  · 

    Update?

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  4. 3,639 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    141 comments  ·  Networking » DNS  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  5. 141 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  5 comments  ·  API Management » Security  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  6. 141 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    8 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » SQL API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  7. 1,272 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    21 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » SQL API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  8. 3,841 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    128 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Reopening this user voice item as our support for Skip/Take (Offset/Limit) was only limited to single partition queries.

    Update.

    The newly released .NET SDK v3 now includes support for x-partition queries using Offset/Limit. You can learn more about v3 SDK and try it and provide feedback on our github repo here.
    github.com/azure/azure-cosmos-dotnet-v3

    We will also be back-porting this functionality to our .NET v2 SDK. This work will begin shortly and we anticipate it to be released in September.

    Once that is released we will mark this feature as complete.

    Thank you for your patience and votes.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  9. 1,679 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    48 comments  ·  Storage » Tables  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  10. 1,045 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    12 comments  ·  Storage » Tables  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Waiting to exhale...

  11. 610 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    31 comments  ·  Web Apps  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Excellent!!! Have been getting around it by putting storage and sql in a different region than the app service and using public ip filtering.

  12. 1,113 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    68 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We definitely recognize the popularity of this feature, and we discuss it constantly during the planning phases. However there are certain technical limitations in the system that add a large amount of development cost. Because of the cost and the fact that there is a workaround available, other features get prioritized over this one.

    That being said, please keep voting for it. The popularity of the feature does help bring it up and makes us reconsider every time.

    Apologies for the delay.

    /Parakh


    Old message:
    We’re doing some research both on the specifics of this ask as well as what it would take to support this.
    Is the ask here to do the same thing that regular Azure AD does (see: https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/enterprisemobility/2014/12/18/azure-active-directory-now-with-group-claims-and-application-roles/) or is are there different requirements around this for Azure AD B2C?

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base