Scott Arbeit

My feedback

  1. 1,720 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    34 comments  ·  Web Apps  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Scott Arbeit supported this idea  · 
  2. 1,049 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    125 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Scott Arbeit supported this idea  · 
  3. 12 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Storage » Storage Explorer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Scott Arbeit supported this idea  · 
  4. 99 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Service Bus  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Scott Arbeit commented  · 

    Seven months later... I'm writing a .NET Core app that's going to talk to Service Bus, and I do a search to see if there's a .NET Core implementation of the Service Bus SDK, and I find my own feedback. Any updates? Is the team working on it at least?

    Scott Arbeit shared this idea  · 
  5. 503 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  6 comments  ·  Azure Search » Query - Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Scott Arbeit supported this idea  · 
  6. 842 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  22 comments  ·  Azure Search » Query - Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Scott Arbeit supported this idea  · 
  7. 396 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  5 comments  ·  Azure Search » Client SDK  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Scott Arbeit supported this idea  · 
  8. 7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Scott Arbeit shared this idea  · 
  9. 61 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    17 comments  ·  Azure portal » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Scott Arbeit supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Scott Arbeit commented  · 

    I'm seeing this too, with almost any blade open. If I switch to another tab in IE, the CPU usage of the Azure Portal tab drops. So... yay for figuring out when the portal is the selected tab; and boo for running so much JavaScript that it sucks up double-digit CPU.

  10. 245 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    22 comments  ·  Azure portal » Resource management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Scott Arbeit commented  · 

    I'm not sure what the motivation was to go with the one-account-at-a-time view, but if that's absolutely necessary for some back-end reason that I don't understand, could we at least get to choose which account comes up by default? Right now I happen to be working inside of a different account than the one that the new code has chosen as my default, so the first thing I have to do every time I log in to the Portal is change my subscription. It's just two clicks, but, still... it's unnecessary, and I can't imagine how the Portal UX team thought this was an improvement. Thanks!

    Scott Arbeit supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base