Dave Medvitz

My feedback

  1. 48 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Networking » Virtual Network  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dave Medvitz supported this idea  · 
  2. 292 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    11 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for the valid suggestion. Your feedback is now open for the user community to upvote which allows us to effectively prioritize your request against our existing feature list and also gives us insight into the potential impact of implementing the suggested feature

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Dave Medvitz commented  · 

    More to the point, there *should not* be any Azure Network Service that does not support UDR, or NSG or VNet peering, for that matter.

    Enterprise customers architect their environments utilizing these key Azure Networking features. To then have AppGW, or Private Link, or Bastion, then not support these key features is ridiculous.

    Dave Medvitz supported this idea  · 
  3. 9 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Networking  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dave Medvitz supported this idea  · 
  4. 77 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Networking » Network Security Groups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Dave Medvitz commented  · 

    This would be especially useful for the default AllowVNet[IN|Out]bound rules. In our organization, we have a hub/spoke network setup, where we have to set our default route to a NVA in the hub. This sets the VirtualNetwork tag to '0.0.0.0/0' and gives us a default NSG rule to *allow all traffic*. While this is the documented behavior, it is not intuitive (you have to go to where the service tags are documented, and even there I don't believe its clear). It also easy to miss-configure, and hard to fix.

  5. 12 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Additional Services » Service Map  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dave Medvitz supported this idea  · 
  6. 348 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    11 comments  ·  Networking » Virtual Network  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Dave Medvitz commented  · 

    Not having this causes a lot of issues with VNet based azure services. DevTest Labs can't use artifacts, Service Fabric (configured for internal only) doesn't install properly, making both less than useful. Manually putting in a DNS suffix does the trick, allowing those machines to get to our internal WPAD file, but we shouldn't need to do this.

    Dave Medvitz supported this idea  · 
  7. 52 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Site Recovery  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dave Medvitz supported this idea  · 
  8. 83 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Networking » VPN Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Dave Medvitz commented  · 

    Increasing the number of VNet Peers would be helpful, as well.

  9. 8 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure portal » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dave Medvitz shared this idea  · 
  10. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Azure portal » Create + deployments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dave Medvitz supported this idea  · 
  11. 37 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  Azure portal » Dashboards + tiles  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dave Medvitz supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base