Ralph Kemperdick

My feedback

  1. 175 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    13 comments  ·  Azure Analysis Services  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ralph Kemperdick supported this idea  · 
  2. 27 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Azure Search » Query - Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ralph Kemperdick supported this idea  · 
  3. 32 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Azure Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ralph Kemperdick supported this idea  · 
  4. 83 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Azure Search » Crawlers  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ralph Kemperdick supported this idea  · 
  5. 149 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Azure Search » Indexing  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ralph Kemperdick supported this idea  · 
  6. 140 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Azure Search » Security  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ralph Kemperdick supported this idea  · 
  7. 273 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Azure Search » Pricing and Quotas  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ralph Kemperdick supported this idea  · 
  8. 429 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Azure Search » Query - Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ralph Kemperdick supported this idea  · 
  9. 203 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Upvotes: 8

    <=-=Mar 5 2017 2:42PM=-=>

    Thanks for this idea. This is a valid requirement and I hope that it will get more votes. Currently we cannot confirm when it will be added, but it is in our backlog.

    <=-=May 22 2017 5:03AM=-=>

    would like it very much, particularly since you already have the CONCAT / GREATEST() a variable number of paramenters and does something with it…

    <=-=Jun 5 2017 12:31PM=-=>

    GREATEST / LEAST functions would be fantastic addition.

    <=-=Nov 14 2017 3:42PM=-=>

    The workarounds using CROSS APPLY or CASE expressions are difficult to manage and read. I’d love to see these implemented.

    Ralph Kemperdick supported this idea  · 
  10. 14 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  SQL Data Warehouse » Performance  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ralph Kemperdick commented  · 

    This seems to be a very valuable optimization and might allow a number of side effects. Wouldn't it potentially allow more concurrent sessions, as fewer conections abe beeing utilized?

    Ralph Kemperdick supported this idea  · 
  11. 415 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    33 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ralph Kemperdick supported this idea  · 
  12. 331 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    16 comments  ·  SQL Data Warehouse » T-SQL  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ralph Kemperdick supported this idea  · 
    Ralph Kemperdick commented  · 

    For any DWH implementation, this convenient statement has been used in our code all over the place. Not having MERGE is causing a lot of pain moving our code to SQL DW. PLEASE provide a smooth transition to the cloud, by having MERGE in SQL DW.

  13. 9 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  SQL Data Warehouse » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ralph Kemperdick supported this idea  · 
  14. 14 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Analytics Platform System  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ralph Kemperdick supported this idea  · 
  15. 859 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    started  ·  97 comments  ·  SQL Data Warehouse » Integration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ralph Kemperdick supported this idea  · 
  16. 79 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  SQL Data Warehouse » Table Structure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ralph Kemperdick supported this idea  · 
  17. 131 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  SQL Data Warehouse » Table Structure  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ralph Kemperdick supported this idea  · 
  18. 112 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    17 comments  ·  SQL Data Warehouse » Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ralph Kemperdick commented  · 

    This is an essential option to keep data over a long period of time offline.

    Ralph Kemperdick supported this idea  · 
  19. 95 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  6 comments  ·  Azure Backup » Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ralph Kemperdick commented  · 

    Would be great, if the Azure Backup Agent Can be paused and resumed without doing a start over from scratch.
    In my Case the initial backup takes three days and after 2.5 days the Network needed urgent maintenance. It could have saved me another 3 days of waiting.

    Ralph Kemperdick supported this idea  · 
  20. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Cloud Services (Web and Worker Role)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ralph Kemperdick shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base