Mike Webber

My feedback

  1. 54 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike Webber supported this idea  · 
  2. 552 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Folks,
    We are working on it. There is an elevation of privilege concern associated with this feature. If a group is assigned a role, any IT admin who can manage group membership can manage that group’s membership and indirectly manage who gets the role. So, we have to ensure that the feature is secure.

    We are taking a staged approach to execute this feature –
    Stage 1: Supporting cloud groups to be assigned to roles
    Stage 2: Supporting on-prem groups to be assigned to roles

    Stay tuned!

    Regards,
    Abhijeet Kumar Sinha
    Azure Active Directory Team

    Mike Webber supported this idea  · 
  3. 44 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike Webber supported this idea  · 
  4. 74 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  Web Apps  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike Webber supported this idea  · 
  5. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike Webber shared this idea  · 
  6. 14 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Web Apps  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike Webber shared this idea  · 
  7. 85 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Networking » Virtual Network  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Mike Webber commented  · 

    Best practices for a virtual data center recommend having a hub and spoke vnet architecture. Ingress and egress controls are placed in the hub and traffic from and to the spokes is forced through the hub. This results in a large amount of data transiting the peered vnets. $.02 per GB for traffic that is not leaving the data center is not acceptable.

    Mike Webber supported this idea  · 
  8. 385 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    started  ·  44 comments  ·  Azure Key Vault » Managing application secrets  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike Webber supported this idea  · 
  9. 168 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    11 comments  ·  Azure Key Vault » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike Webber shared this idea  · 
  10. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    need-feedback  ·  4 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » Domain Services  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike Webber supported this idea  · 
  11. 19 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Web Apps  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike Webber shared this idea  · 
  12. 36 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike Webber shared this idea  · 
  13. 85 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Mike Webber commented  · 

    Use case 2 is similar to ours. We would like the ability to have VSTS perform the ARM deployment to create the database resource. Then create a contained database user for the service principal used in the VSTS service endpoint. Then VSTS would be able to deploy the SQL scripts in a subsequent task without requiring VSTS to have or use the SA credentials. This is very important when sharing the same logical server across multiple applications and teams.

    Mike Webber supported this idea  · 
  14. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Mike Webber shared this idea  · 
  15. 2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike Webber shared this idea  · 
  16. 74 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Service Bus  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike Webber supported this idea  · 
  17. 7 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike Webber shared this idea  · 
  18. 423 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    24 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike Webber supported this idea  · 
  19. 1,958 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    91 comments  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Great news – static IP range for Azure Integration Runtime is now available in all ADF regions! You can whitelist specific IP ranges for ADF as part of firewall rules. The IPs are documented here: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/data-factory/azure-integration-runtime-ip-addresses#azure-integration-runtime-ip-addresses-specific-regions. Static IP ranges for gov cloud and China cloud will be published soon!

    Please refer to this blog post on how you can use various mechanisms including trusted Azure service and static IP to secure data access through ADF:
    https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/azure-data-factory/azure-data-factory-now-supports-static-ip-address-ranges/ba-p/1117508

    Service tag support will be made available in next few weeks. Please stay tuned!

    If your network security requirement calls for ADF support for VNet and cannot be met using Trusted Azure service (released in Oct 2019), static IP range (released in Jan 2020), or service tag (upcoming), please vote for VNet feature here: https://feedback.azure.com/forums/270578-data-factory/suggestions/37105363-data-factory-should-be-able-to-use-vnet-without-re

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Mike Webber commented  · 

    It's not reasonable to expect enterprises who are trying to secure their data in an Azure SQL Database to open the firewall to allow all of Azure to connect. Until this feature is available, Data Factory is not a viable option.

    Mike Webber supported this idea  · 
  20. 8 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Automation » User Experience  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike Webber shared this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base