Mike Webber

My feedback

  1. 38 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    You can make it optional to provide a value for a param, by using a defaultValue and in some cases, just make the value “empty”. For example:

    “defaultValue”: ""

    If you have scenarios where this isn’t working for you feel free to email…

    Mike Webber supported this idea  · 
  2. 67 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  Web Apps  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike Webber supported this idea  · 
  3. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike Webber shared this idea  · 
  4. 12 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Web Apps  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike Webber shared this idea  · 
  5. 29 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Networking » Virtual Network  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike Webber commented  · 

    Best practices for a virtual data center recommend having a hub and spoke vnet architecture. Ingress and egress controls are placed in the hub and traffic from and to the spokes is forced through the hub. This results in a large amount of data transiting the peered vnets. $.02 per GB for traffic that is not leaving the data center is not acceptable.

    Mike Webber supported this idea  · 
  6. 234 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Mike Webber supported this idea  · 
  7. 80 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Azure Key Vault » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike Webber shared this idea  · 
  8. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure Active Directory » Domain Services  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike Webber supported this idea  · 
  9. 16 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Web Apps  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike Webber shared this idea  · 
  10. 36 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike Webber shared this idea  · 
  11. 54 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike Webber commented  · 

    Use case 2 is similar to ours. We would like the ability to have VSTS perform the ARM deployment to create the database resource. Then create a contained database user for the service principal used in the VSTS service endpoint. Then VSTS would be able to deploy the SQL scripts in a subsequent task without requiring VSTS to have or use the SA credentials. This is very important when sharing the same logical server across multiple applications and teams.

    Mike Webber supported this idea  · 
  12. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Mike Webber shared this idea  · 
  13. 2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike Webber shared this idea  · 
  14. 67 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Service Bus  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike Webber supported this idea  · 
  15. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike Webber shared this idea  · 
  16. 360 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    21 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We have raised the limit to 100 recently. We are regularly reviewing the limits and will continue to look for opportunities to raise the limits even further. If you have scenarios requiring limits higher than what is supported, please add your scenario details here (if you are comfortable with that) or raise an issue with Azure support and we will get back to you.

    Mike Webber supported this idea  · 
  17. 1,388 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    48 comments  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your suggestion. We understand it is super important to whitelist specific IP list for ADF as part of firewall rules and avoid opening network access to all. We are working on this with high priority. Once this is ready, we will also add ADF to the list of “Trusted Azure service” for Azure Storage and Azure SQL DB/DW.

    Mike Webber commented  · 

    It's not reasonable to expect enterprises who are trying to secure their data in an Azure SQL Database to open the firewall to allow all of Azure to connect. Until this feature is available, Data Factory is not a viable option.

    Mike Webber supported this idea  · 
  18. 8 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Automation » User Experience  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike Webber shared this idea  · 
  19. 1,088 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    33 comments  ·  Web Apps  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike Webber supported this idea  · 
  20. 24 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  (General Feedback) » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike Webber supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base