AB

My feedback

  1. 152 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Upvotes: 72

    <=-=Mar 10 2016 11:26AM=-=>

    It’s a shame that this was submitted as just a “suggestion”. It should actually be listed as a “bug” because there’s only a comparatively small set of use cases where enumeration of the result set of elements is not important.

    <=-=Mar 11 2016 12:47PM=-=>

    I agree that an order column is required; one example use case is where two lists are passed in, and ordinal positions in one list correspond to positions in the other.

    <=-=Mar 11 2016 3:12PM=-=>

    Please see the related suggestion: STRING_SPLIT needs “RemoveEmptyEntries” option, like String.Split in .NET ( https://connect.microsoft.com/SQLServer/feedback/details/2462002/ ).

    <=-=Mar 12 2016 12:02PM=-=>

    This kind of function is primarily needed for de-serializing previously serialized arrays of values of any type format-able as text.
    I therefore recommend to have the result set of this function work excellent with this use-case.

    With de-serialized arrays there is a need to…

    AB supported this idea  · 
  2. 90 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    29 comments  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    AB supported this idea  · 
  3. 1,000 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    31 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    AB commented  · 

    Any ETA for this feature please ?

    AB commented  · 

    + 3 Votes, Need this now. Any ETA for this feature please ?

  4. 11 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Azure Analysis Services  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    AB supported this idea  · 
    AB commented  · 

    Not sure if this is a port of some SSAS code or what, but I agree it makes no sense to install an on Prem Gateway for a cloud based table

  5. 165 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    started  ·  11 comments  ·  Networking » Azure Front Door Service  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    AB supported this idea  · 
  6. 140 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  Networking » Content Delivery Network  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    AB supported this idea  · 
  7. 85 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    AB supported this idea  · 
  8. 273 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  9 comments  ·  CDN  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    AB supported this idea  · 
  9. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  (General Feedback) » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    AB shared this idea  · 
  10. 359 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    16 comments  ·  Signup and Billing  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    AB commented  · 

    World population 7.442 Billion. USA population 325.7 million. When will Azure be ready for the other 7.1 Billion?

  11. 81 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    unplanned  ·  27 comments  ·  Azure portal » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    AB commented  · 

    "We are working to enable this feature in the near future" 30th January 2015!

  12. 12 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  (General Feedback) » azure.microsoft.com  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    AB supported this idea  · 
  13. 42 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Application Insights » Smart Detection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hi All,

    Thank you for your feedback and suggestions!

    Following your feedback, we’re changing the default roles that receive email notifications from Smart Detection.

    Specifically, starting April 1, 2019, email notifications from Smart Detection will be sent only to users assigned to the subscription’s Monitoring Reader or Monitoring Contributor roles.

    More information about this upcoming change and how to prepare for it can be found here: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/updates/upcoming-change-to-azure-monitor-application-insights-smart-detection-emails/

    Thanks,
    Harel

    AB supported this idea  · 
  14. 477 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    18 comments  ·  Web Apps  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hi all,

    We are currently working on items that will enable service endpoints for multi-tenant App service. We will share the news of the features we deliver on the App Service Blog here: aka.ms/AppServiceBlog.

    We also expect to speak about this topic at the Ignite conference in September in Orlando.

    Thanks,
    Oded

    AB supported this idea  · 
  15. 20 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  6 comments  ·  SQL Server » Bugs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    AB commented  · 

    Seeing the same issue. tried the MS Oracle provider and that comes up with a slightly different error but still an error when trying to preview. Spent the last 3 hours looking online for a solution.

  16. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Signup and Billing  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    AB shared this idea  · 
  17. 141 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    10 comments  ·  Azure Functions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    AB supported this idea  · 
  18. 2,212 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: oidc
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    72 comments  ·  Storage » Blobs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your feedback. We are currently in public preview of static website hosting for Azure Storage to enable this scenario. Check out the blog post here for more details: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/azure-storage-static-web-hosting-public-preview. The feature set includes support for default documents and custom error documents for HTTP status code 404.

    For any further questions, or to discuss your specific scenario, send us an email at azurestoragefeedback@microsoft.com.

    AB supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base