Hans Olav Stjernholm

My feedback

  1. 192 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    Check!
    (thinking…)
    Reset
    or sign in with
      Password icon
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
      30 comments  ·  Web Apps  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
      Hans Olav Stjernholm commented  · 

      Any progress on this? Pretty please! :)

      Hans Olav Stjernholm commented  · 

      Any chance this could be made on this side of Christmas? i.e. does Christmas come early this year? :)

      Hans Olav Stjernholm supported this idea  · 
      Hans Olav Stjernholm commented  · 

      Yes yes yes! I just want the client certificate to be propagated if the LB finds one (sent along with HttpClient or HttpWebRequest or whatever).

      Pls make this happen! That would solve all my authentication problems with Web Apps and make my day - no, year! It would make my year!

    • 1,370 votes
      Vote
      Sign in
      Check!
      (thinking…)
      Reset
      or sign in with
        Password icon
        Signed in as (Sign out)
        You have left! (?) (thinking…)
        82 comments  ·  Storage » Tables  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
        Hans Olav Stjernholm commented  · 

        inattention and neglect is the perfect summary of ATS. Microsoft, up the price or do whatever, just do something.

        SSD-backed storage + secondary indexes is a no-brainer.

        Hans Olav Stjernholm commented  · 

        Aaron, DocumentDB is not a replacement, it is a totally different beast and not a key-value store such as Table Storage. Also DocumentDB is not portable (yet at least) and gives you a lock-in to the public Azure cloud. Table Storage is portable through Azure Stack.

        I dream and hope MS is picking up Table Storage again and gives us Premium (SSD-backed) and with secondary indexes. There's really no reason on this good earth they shouldn't do this!

        Hans Olav Stjernholm commented  · 

        Regarding table storage, I've also noticed that in the new portal when you look at diagnostics config in WebApps, there's only File Storage and Blob Storage as options, while in the classic portal you also have Table Storage as an option.

        Even more, I've noticed that the internal logging in WebJobs via WebJobs Dashboard seems to have moved from using Table Storage to using Blob Storage - but that may be for any number of reasons, of course.

        Anyways, I wouldn't recommend table storage as a long-term option for anything new for these reasons. And of course it's hard to use without any secondary indexing.

        Hans Olav Stjernholm commented  · 

        I have to say that I totally agree with people saying this is a MUST for azure table storage. Really, how is it possible to use this in any sensible way without custom indexing?

        EPIC FAIL!

      • 245 votes
        Vote
        Sign in
        Check!
        (thinking…)
        Reset
        or sign in with
          Password icon
          Signed in as (Sign out)
          You have left! (?) (thinking…)
          unplanned  ·  9 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
          Hans Olav Stjernholm supported this idea  · 
          Hans Olav Stjernholm commented  · 

          For the traditional Microsoft Stack developers, the Azure Stack without SQL Databases is close to pointless. Here's the feeling I currently get:

          Do you love steak? You want it your way? In your own house? Here you go: Vegan tofu steak!
          I guess it's technically a steak, but man that's not the same thing!

        Feedback and Knowledge Base