Jesper Jønsson

My feedback

  1. 57 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  8 comments  ·  Networking » Network Security Groups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jesper Jønsson supported this idea  · 
  2. 25 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure Active Directory » Domain Join  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jesper Jønsson supported this idea  · 
  3. 234 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    25 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » Domain Join  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jesper Jønsson supported this idea  · 
  4. 246 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    61 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » Azure AD Connect  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We are aware of the requirement to be able to convert a synced user to cloud only and are designing that feature, but we have no timelines to share right now.
    We reverted the change that would block the “hack” to delete and restore a user to change a user to “Cloud Only”.

    Jesper Jønsson supported this idea  · 
  5. 259 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    35 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » Application Proxy  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jesper Jønsson supported this idea  · 
  6. 465 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Jesper Jønsson supported this idea  · 
  7. 124 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  5 comments  ·  Storage » Tables  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jesper Jønsson commented  · 

    I fully agree. This feature is crucial to low-latency applications. Please review this suggestion and update it with a status, so we know what your thoughts are.

  8. 1,223 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Folks,

    Thanks for the questions and suggestions. And apologies for not sharing any update on this thread for so long. We’ve been working on this problem and have announced changes on our official team blog (see here: https://cloudblogs.microsoft.com/enterprisemobility/2016/09/15/cleaning-up-the-azure-ad-and-microsoft-account-overlap/).

    First, we are acutely aware of the UX pain this is causing and we are sorry for this. We are trying to undo a decade and a half of systems divergence. There are literally hundreds of different engineering teams across Microsoft involved in this effort. So this is taking time.

    Second, we can’t easily “merge” two accounts, or allow IT to “take over” personal Microsoft accounts. There are two main hurdles: (1) The terms of service are fundamentally different for the two account types and (2) they are based on different technologies with different stacks (different identifiers, SDKs, token formats, etc.). We’re working to converge the two stacks but again this…

    Jesper Jønsson commented  · 

    Agreed. Definitely and issue that needs to be resolved. We have the same situation.

  9. 18 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Cloud Services (Web and Worker Role)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jesper Jønsson supported this idea  · 
  10. 45 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    8 comments  ·  Cloud Services (Web and Worker Role)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jesper Jønsson supported this idea  · 
  11. 52 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  2 comments  ·  Cloud Services (Web and Worker Role)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jesper Jønsson supported this idea  · 
  12. 398 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  7 comments  ·  Cloud Services (Web and Worker Role)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jesper Jønsson supported this idea  · 
  13. 415 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    8 comments  ·  Cloud Services (Web and Worker Role)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jesper Jønsson supported this idea  · 
  14. 1,212 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    57 comments  ·  Cloud Services (Web and Worker Role)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Windows Azure Websites offers the ability to have smaller deployed websites. The ability to have multiple roles on a single VM instance is still in planning.

    Jesper Jønsson supported this idea  · 
  15. 217 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    15 comments  ·  Storage » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jesper Jønsson supported this idea  · 
  16. 4,649 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    186 comments  ·  Storage » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for the feedback! We are interested in collecting feedback on this request – please vote for it if this is something you like to see.

    We’re also interested in learning more what people want to use the SFTP/FTPS for and which protocol they prefer. Please feel free to leave us a comment letting us know more detail!

    Thanks,

    Will Gries
    Program Manager, Azure Files

    Jesper Jønsson supported this idea  · 
  17. 1,073 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    26 comments  ·  Storage » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your feedback. We view this ask as a set of related features.

    Soft delete for blobs enables you to save and recover your data where blobs or blob snapshots are deleted. It does not protect against container or account deletion. This feature is currently generally available. You can see the announcement here: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/soft-delete-for-azure-storage-blobs-ga/ and the full documentation here: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/storage/blobs/storage-blob-soft-delete

    Object versioning will also offer object-level protection, and will offer a few incremental improvements to soft delete. Specifically, it will make recovery of deleted data easier. This feature is planned for the coming year.

    Container soft delete will protect against container-level deletion and modification. This feature is planned for the coming year as well.

    Native support for blob backup will protect against account-level deletion and modification, and is currently on our backlog.

    We will provide updates when they become available. For any further questions, or to discuss your…

    Jesper Jønsson supported this idea  · 
  18. 9 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Virtual Machines » Windows  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jesper Jønsson commented  · 

    Faster file uploads via VPN to network shares on VMs, please. This is a deal breaker for us as well. We are located in Denmark and experiencing slow upload speed on 50 MB files to the datacenter in Western Europe. Smaller files are 20x faster to upload than bigger files. We see it at about 500 kb/s instead of 10 mb/s.

  19. 26 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jesper Jønsson supported this idea  · 
  20. 206 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    9 comments  ·  Virtual Machines » Windows  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jesper Jønsson shared this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base