ΕΨΗΕΛΩΝ

My feedback

  1. 1,547 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    65 comments  ·  Networking » IPv6  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    IPv6 in Azure VNET is currently previewing globally- in ALL Azure Public cloud regions.

    Announcement (Service Update): https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/updates/public-preview-microsoft-adds-full-ipv6-support-for-azure-vnets/

    Links to Documentation & Samples
    Full documentation including sample scripts is available here: https://aka.ms/IPv6ForAzureVNETdoc

    A sample JSON template is posted in the quickstart repository: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/resources/templates/ipv6-in-vnet/

    ΕΨΗΕΛΩΝ commented  · 

    Also ridiculous that VMs and cloud services don't support IPv6. I currently have to use port mappings to access different VMs behind the same cloud service in SSH, instead of a unique global IPv6 address on port 22

    ΕΨΗΕΛΩΝ supported this idea  · 
  2. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Virtual Machines » Windows  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ΕΨΗΕΛΩΝ commented  · 

    In fact, I would like to report an authentication issue with private browsing and cookie policy

    ΕΨΗΕΛΩΝ supported this idea  · 
  3. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ΕΨΗΕΛΩΝ commented  · 

    Can you follow any of the plenties of online tutorials about mail server? If you want to use Linux, I can recommed taking a look at susestudio.com's gallery (I'm not affiliated with them, I just had great experience) to see if there is any publicly available image of a mail server ready-to-be-configured.

    Susestudio images can be imported into Azure as VM images with a single click

  4. 14 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Can you share a few more details on what you are thinking about here? Just a more simple version of the portal?

    Corey

    ΕΨΗΕΛΩΝ commented  · 

    I would personally downvote on this. 1- IT should be IT's responsibility. Large organizations should hire a number of IT staff people sufficient to manage employees' IT needs. If any employee was able to deploy his/her own cloud machines at the maximum performance level the business would ran out of money within days. 2- Azure APIs offer OAuth backed functionality, so enterprise IT can develop their own internal portal that serves individual requests enforcing company policies and avoiding people to mess up with Management portal.

    With no great (but not even little) effort IT can develop a secure and efficient self-provisioning solution, where for example developers in a software company can request, with their manager's approval, cloud resources for UAT deployments, stress and scalability testing, etc. with the great flexibility of cloud.

  5. 169 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    10 comments  ·  Storage  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ΕΨΗΕΛΩΝ commented  · 

    Today blob storage can be mounted as CIFS/SMB. This satisfies my needs even if I don't really like SMB for its lower level of security (as I can rely on Azure's internal network). I'm removing my own votes from this

    ΕΨΗΕΛΩΝ shared this idea  · 
  6. 32 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ΕΨΗΕΛΩΝ supported this idea  · 
  7. 1,953 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    272 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for the valid suggestion. Your feedback is now open for the user community to upvote which allows us to effectively prioritize your request against our existing feature list and also gives us insight into the potential impact of implementing the suggested feature

    ΕΨΗΕΛΩΝ supported this idea  · 
  8. 1,070 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    26 comments  ·  Storage » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your feedback. We view this ask as a set of related features.

    Soft delete for blobs enables you to save and recover your data where blobs or blob snapshots are deleted. It does not protect against container or account deletion. This feature is currently generally available. You can see the announcement here: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/soft-delete-for-azure-storage-blobs-ga/ and the full documentation here: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/storage/blobs/storage-blob-soft-delete

    Object versioning will also offer object-level protection, and will offer a few incremental improvements to soft delete. Specifically, it will make recovery of deleted data easier. This feature is planned for the coming year.

    Container soft delete will protect against container-level deletion and modification. This feature is planned for the coming year as well.

    Native support for blob backup will protect against account-level deletion and modification, and is currently on our backlog.

    We will provide updates when they become available. For any further questions, or to discuss your…

    ΕΨΗΕΛΩΝ supported this idea  · 
  9. 619 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    23 comments  ·  Cloud Services (Web and Worker Role)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    SSL only requires multiple IPs when the client is on Windows XP, using an older version of Internet Explorer. Most modern browsers support SNI (Server Name Indication) and thus don’t require multiple IPs.

    Support for multiple IPs is under review in the team.

    ΕΨΗΕΛΩΝ commented  · 

    I disagree with Brian. I've found that major mobile browsers, Firefox for Android, Chrome and Safari implement SNI. Until we get IPv6 on client networks SNI is a good option. I upvote this idea because there is a fair balance between security and compatibility when using SNI. My hosting platform auto redirects you to SSL if your browser supports SNI, but still allows you to use HTTP if it doesn't: it's up to the client to choose whether to update the browser or not.

    ΕΨΗΕΛΩΝ supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base