755 votesplanned · 26 comments · API Management » API management experience · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Azure has this capability already with EA & CSP. We would like to offer this for Web direct customers as well.
-Matt (Azure Billing)
Hey folks, sorry for the late update. Some backend changes were made to alleviate this issue but I believe it doesn’t solve it for everyone yet. Let me go get some details and come back with a better update. Thanks!
Azure Cosmos DB now provides the ability to access the change feed (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cosmos-db/change-feed). A common pattern to implement eventing patterns is
1. Store every version/change as a separate item
2. Read the change feed to merge/consolidate changes and trigger appropriate actions downstream.
You can also expire old versions using TTL: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cosmos-db/time-to-livePhilip Coupar shared this idea ·
Thank you for your feedback. Providing container capacity metrics is on our backlog but there is no ETA we can share at this time. We will provide updates when they become available. For any further questions, or to discuss your specific scenario, send us an email at firstname.lastname@example.org.
119 votesunder review · 2 comments · Azure portal » Resource management · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
We have made some great progress on this idea and most of our services today do support move resources across groups.
We are still working towards 100% support and while we do that it would be great if you can help us prioritize the missing services.
Please file individual asks on each service category present in uservoice and vote for it.
Azure Portal Team
127 votesunplanned · 15 comments · Azure portal » Search + navigation · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Thanks, we hear you.
Right now I can’t give you a date but we continue to listen.
939 votesunplanned · AdminSQL Database feature voting forum admins (Product Owner, Microsoft Azure) responded
This is not currently planned at this time. Will keep this item open for voting and comments.
We are more focused around data synchronization than schema synchronization at the moment. We may revisit the priority of this in the future.