Shahid Iqbal

My feedback

  1. 74 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Networking » Azure Front Door Service  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for the valid suggestion. Your feedback is now open for the user community to upvote which allows us to effectively prioritize your request against our existing feature list and also gives us insight into the potential impact of implementing the suggested feature

    Shahid Iqbal supported this idea  · 
  2. 193 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    started  ·  6 comments  ·  Networking » Azure Front Door Service  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Shahid Iqbal commented  · 

    Echo what Dennis has already said, having ability to add/re-write custom headers will make AFD much more attractive for scenarios where you can host content in storage and want to ensure security headers are applied.

    Shahid Iqbal supported this idea  · 
  3. 43 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    triaged  ·  4 comments  ·  Networking » Azure Front Door Service  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Shahid Iqbal commented  · 

    I'd like header rewrite features similar to App Gateway v2 so I can add security headers like CSP etc to static hosting in storage

    https://azure.microsoft.com/en-gb/blog/rewrite-http-headers-with-azure-application-gateway/

    Shahid Iqbal supported this idea  · 
  4. 12 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Storage  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Shahid Iqbal shared this idea  · 
  5. 476 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    17 comments  ·  Networking » Azure Front Door Service  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Shahid Iqbal supported this idea  · 
  6. 230 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    started  ·  15 comments  ·  Networking » Azure Front Door Service  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Shahid Iqbal supported this idea  · 
  7. 99 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Web Apps » Deployment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    There was some confusion about this feature due to the documentation for it and UX originally released had a bug.

    The IP Restrictions feature works as an ALLOW list, rather than a DENY list as originally stated.

    The ask here is still valid, there are other services in azure (like SQL) that have UI to explicitly allow other azure services to reach the database. While this is convenient for development scenarios, it’s not a good idea for securing the resource.

    We’ll keep an eye on this request and see if it gathers more up-votes.

    -Byron

    Shahid Iqbal commented  · 

    Same issue really with Azure DevOps agents not being able to view the site during a deployment so UI tests fail.
    Would be great to either give the same option as azure sql does or allow importing of ip restrictions in a more workable manner. File upload (ideally in same format as we can get for IP ranges for Azure)

  8. 88 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) » Portal  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Shahid Iqbal supported this idea  · 
  9. 225 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    8 comments  ·  Storage » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Shahid Iqbal supported this idea  · 
  10. 208 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Shahid Iqbal supported this idea  · 
  11. 1,261 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    36 comments  ·  Web Apps  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  12. 1,146 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    45 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Shahid Iqbal supported this idea  · 
  13. 617 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    27 comments  ·  Web Apps  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Shahid Iqbal commented  · 

    I didn't see any announcement at Ignite? Or am I missing something

  14. 21 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Shahid Iqbal supported this idea  · 
  15. 403 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    10 comments  ·  Storage » Blobs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Shahid Iqbal shared this idea  · 
  16. 2,397 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    59 comments  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  17. 347 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    54 comments  ·  Lab Services  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Shahid Iqbal supported this idea  · 
  18. 72 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    10 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » Domain Services  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Shahid Iqbal supported this idea  · 
    Shahid Iqbal commented  · 

    Beyond redundancy I work with clients who run SaaS solutions deployed to IaaS across regions for different customers and being able to "domain join" their VMs to their AAD would be fantastic. Currently the option of running VPN gateways back to a VNET to enable this isn't an option

  19. 1,918 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    170 comments  ·  Signup and Billing  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hey folks, sorry for the late update. Some backend changes were made to alleviate this issue but I believe it doesn’t solve it for everyone yet. Let me go get some details and come back with a better update. Thanks!

    John

    Shahid Iqbal commented  · 

    Looking forward to an update soon, thoroughly bored of the incognito window dance whenever I want to access different subscriptions

    Shahid Iqbal supported this idea  · 
  20. 78 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Shahid Iqbal supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base