Manfred Linnert

My feedback

  1. 56 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » SQL API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manfred Linnert commented  · 

    this should in fact support any kind of azure function, just expecting the implementation of some predefined interface. for performance reasons alone this should be a goal. with the world turning towards more performant options even on the web, it cant be that we are seriously stuck with something like javascript in a database where performance is a top priority.

    Manfred Linnert supported this idea  · 
  2. 60 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Service Fabric  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manfred Linnert commented  · 

    yes that would be great, especially not because of any container-support but for the reliable-stateful-services and actors that service fabric supports, that can be a ton more useful on IoT than any container or akka implementation. it would also mean we could nicely reuse parts of the code we've already written for service-fabric in the backend

    Manfred Linnert supported this idea  · 
  3. 5 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  (General Feedback) » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Manfred Linnert shared this idea  · 
  4. 14 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Service Fabric  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Manfred Linnert shared this idea  · 
  5. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Manfred Linnert shared this idea  · 
  6. 52 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Service Fabric  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manfred Linnert commented  · 

    had the same idea recently- and its not just about "not wanting to have a VM", in my oppinion it would fill a gap in scalability. currently the smallest usefull cluster is 3 to 5 servers.
    i think people should get encouraged to write as much as possible (or almost everything) using technologies like statefull services and actors. with the need to have at least 5 servers plus a domain and a real certificate related to that domain just to get it secure,there is quite a barrier for someone starting new. i assume many wont consider it as an option because for their need having 5 servers is a total overkill, and the price to pay for them as well. so they start using traditional web-services and would need to redesign and rewrite considerably large parts of the project to switch to service fabric at a later point in time. if, like for web-services, there were a service-fabric-as-a-service, where you only register, then upload your project and it runs under some autogenerated URL, invisibly sharing the servers and resources with maybe dozens of other people and projects, many more might be encouraged to us this approach. even a student could start make his fun-projects using service-fabric. if his fun-project turns out a success he could just easily shift it to a full cluster without any changes required. also for testing new projects in early beta on the web this would be excellent. please consider this idea, i think it would drastically increase the number of people knowing,using,and loving service-fabric!

    Manfred Linnert supported this idea  · 
  7. 44 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Service Fabric  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Manfred Linnert shared this idea  · 
  8. 416 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Service Fabric  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Manfred Linnert supported this idea  · 
  9. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  (General Feedback) » azure.microsoft.com  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Manfred Linnert shared this idea  · 
  10. 168 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    22 comments  ·  Virtual Machines » Windows  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Manfred Linnert supported this idea  · 
  11. 277 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    21 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Manfred Linnert supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base