James Reategui

My feedback

  1. 4,720 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    146 comments  ·  Storage » Blobs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    You can now use the Azure CDN to access blobs with custom domains over HTTPS. See the following article for instructions on how to do so: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/storage/storage-https-custom-domain-cdn. Having talked to a number of customers, we concluded that this solution addresses many scenarios where the need for HTTPS access to blobs with custom domains exists.

    Native Azure Storage support for using SSL to access blobs at custom domains is still on our backlog. We would love to hear about your scenarios where using the Azure CDN is not an acceptable solution, either by posting on this thread or sending us an email at azurestoragefeedback@microsoft.com.

    James Reategui supported this idea  · 
  2. 439 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    20 comments  ·  Web Apps  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    James Reategui supported this idea  · 
  3. 483 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    13 comments  ·  Azure Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    James Reategui supported this idea  · 
  4. 274 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Azure Search » Crawlers  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    James Reategui supported this idea  · 
  5. 418 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Azure Search » Query - Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    James Reategui supported this idea  · 
  6. 739 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    10 comments  ·  Azure Search » Indexing  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    James Reategui supported this idea  · 
  7. 1,381 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    37 comments  ·  Azure Search » Pricing and Quotas  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    James Reategui supported this idea  · 
  8. 754 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  16 comments  ·  Azure Search » Query - Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    James Reategui supported this idea  · 
    James Reategui commented  · 

    just ran into this problem, it would be useful to have this!

  9. 3,842 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    128 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Reopening this user voice item as our support for Skip/Take (Offset/Limit) was only limited to single partition queries.

    Update.

    The newly released .NET SDK v3 now includes support for x-partition queries using Offset/Limit. You can learn more about v3 SDK and try it and provide feedback on our github repo here.
    github.com/azure/azure-cosmos-dotnet-v3

    We will also be back-porting this functionality to our .NET v2 SDK. This work will begin shortly and we anticipate it to be released in September.

    Once that is released we will mark this feature as complete.

    Thank you for your patience and votes.

    James Reategui supported this idea  · 
  10. 1,214 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  36 comments  ·  Azure Search » Client SDK  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    James Reategui supported this idea  · 
  11. 377 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  5 comments  ·  Azure Search » Client SDK  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    James Reategui supported this idea  · 
  12. 123 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Azure Search » Query - Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    James Reategui supported this idea  · 
  13. 79 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  SDK and Tools » Tools for Visual Studio  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Brady Gaster responded

    I’ve discussed an idea like this with a few of the web tooling Program Managers recently, and we all agree that the feature is indeed a legitimate one we should consider. The discussions are really early.

    We do have support for uploading files to blob storage accounts directly from within VS. We also have web publishing capabilities. Add to that the support we have in Razor for being able to load things like jQuery from disk when the site’s running in debug mode to later loading from a CDN, and it seems like something we could develop.

    We’re looking into the options now. I’ll keep this thread updated in the future.

    James Reategui supported this idea  · 
  14. 15 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  2 comments  ·  Signup and Billing  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  15. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Media Services » Portal  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Nick Drouin responded

    Thank you for your feedback, we will consider this when planning the feature work for the Media Services portal.

    James Reategui shared this idea  · 
  16. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  SDK and Tools » Tools for Visual Studio  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  17. 45 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    8 comments  ·  Cloud Services (Web and Worker Role)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    James Reategui commented  · 

    I have just lived through what JNK has explained. A solution that would easily solve that problem would help us want to continue using Azure.

Feedback and Knowledge Base