43 votes5 comments · Azure Monitor- Alert Management » Managing Alerts · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
We are currently working on this capability.
You can now use the Azure CDN to access blobs with custom domains over HTTPS. See the following article for instructions on how to do so: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/storage/storage-https-custom-domain-cdn. Having talked to a number of customers, we concluded that this solution addresses many scenarios where the need for HTTPS access to blobs with custom domains exists.
Native Azure Storage support for using SSL to access blobs at custom domains is still on our backlog. We would love to hear about your scenarios where using the Azure CDN is not an acceptable solution, either by posting on this thread or sending us an email at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Thank you for your feedback. We’re considering this for a future release of Azure Search.
Azure Search Product Team
Thank you for your feedback. Providing this functionality is on our backlog but there is no ETA we can share at this time. We will provide updates when they become available. For any further questions, or to discuss your specific scenario, send us an email at email@example.com.
Thank you for your feedback. We are currently in public preview of static website hosting for Azure Storage to enable this scenario. Check out the blog post here for more details: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/azure-storage-static-web-hosting-public-preview. The feature set includes support for default documents and custom error documents for HTTP status code 404.
For any further questions, or to discuss your specific scenario, send us an email at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Still unplanned, but please keep the votes coming!
An error occurred while saving the commentBede commented
I would very much like to see this support - being able to use the full depth of ASP.NET Core libraries and toolchain would be a vast improvement over the stunted and relatively poorly tooled HTTP request pipeline currently available on Azure Functions.
I would go as far as saying that this would be the major enabling feature for me to migrate major web service infrastructure to Azure functions.
Also, Amazon's already done it in Lambda:
Apologies for the confusion on our part.
This is currently not on our roadmap. However, we will review this item in the future as we prioritize future releases.
Thanks for your suggestion.
We’re looking at a few different ways to implement this and finalizing on a design (just correcting status)
Thanks for your feedback. Currently, we don’t have any plans for R support in Functions. We will monitor the votes on this request to accordingly inform the priority on our backlog.
I’ve gotten a few questions about this item recently, so I just wanted to give a more detailed status. We still have this on the backlog; it hasn’t been forgotten. But we don’t have a clear timeline for when we would get to it right now. The “unplanned” status just means that it can’t be tied to a timeline, but we do think this is a valid request that we would like to have in the product.