Thanks for submitting the suggestion! In order to help us better address this problem, could you please share with us why you would like to hide the VM cost?
Thanks for submitting your idea. We are reviewing this now. For those who would like to see this feature sooner, please don’t hesitate to vote for it.
Thanks.Cliff Schomburg commented
+ 1, I would like to see the VM size as a column so I can ensure I'm keeping costs down.
We have this feature in our backlog, but unfortunately don’t have a timeline for it. For those who would like to see this sooner, please vote for it.
341 votesunder review · AdminAzure IaaS Engineering Team (Azure IaaS Engineering Team, Microsoft, Microsoft Azure) responded
The status of this item has been moved back to Under Review. We initially planned to move to VHDX support as part of our support for HyperV Gen2 VMs, but we ended up using the VHD format for Gen2 VMs as well. Some aspects of the Azure Infrastructure do not cleanly support VHDX OS or data disks. So this feature is dependent on some of these internal services being updated which is an ongoing process.Cliff Schomburg commented
Would someone from the Azure product team validate this feedback and provide a response? This is an important feature for many of us based on the comments below and total number of votes.