Since it's a docker feature, I'm pretty sure this is just a matter of exposing some settings just like the mountOptions in AKS. I'm checking the docs regularly hoping it will be resolved, but no luck.
Thank you for your feedback. Symlinks is in Azure Files backlog but we do not have specific timeline to share yet.
Erf, just wasted a fair bit of time trying to achieve something with azure container instances only to get stuck with that :( so disappointing...
106 votesunder review · 2 comments · Networking » Application Gateway · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
shouldn't all rules be configurable?
Thank you for all the votes and feedback. We have started work on this and the capability will be supported soon. If you would like to get in touch with us to discuss your scenarios, please fill this form: https://aka.ms/ApplicationGatewayCohort
This is on our long term roadmap.
We have raised the limit to 100 recently. We are regularly reviewing the limits and will continue to look for opportunities to raise the limits even further. If you have scenarios requiring limits higher than what is supported, please add your scenario details here (if you are comfortable with that) or raise an issue with Azure support and we will get back to you.
333 votesplanned · 15 comments · Azure Backup » Retention and Storage · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
I think your could have set this one as completed instead of closed.
The request was to have a colder storage tier with prices equal or lower to amazon Glacier.
As far as I’m concerned the new Archive tier which is available with prices like 0.002 per Gigabyte is answering that need.
It is even actually exceeding it as it provide the convenience of the rich blob storage api where Glacier is a complete different Api compared to S3.
Hope this will help people which might be confused by this status update.
And btw comparing cold storage and glacier is a bit unfair since cold storage offers the exact same API as hot storage which is way more convenient than Glacier's vaults.
Yes we definitely need a colder, cheaper tier to azure storage, which would allow cheap long term retention of data (in an agnostic way as storage does).
Glacier is currently 7 euro per To/Month, it is not clear from tarification but it seems it is LRS storage. Azure LRS Cold storage is 8.4 euro per To/Month. This is not a huge difference but it can matter.
Where Azure could make a big difference with a colder tier would be with GRS cold storage is currently 16.9 euros / To / Month and this is quite prohibitive. I think there might be interesting technical solutions to provide extremely resilient cold storage for a cheaper price (with increased data retrieval costs I guess).
Azure Cosmos DB is a multi-model database service, and therefore supports accessing the same underlying data using any/all APIs. We are however implementing some platform-level changes to make data access from different APIs seamless like supporting conversions between disparate type systems, and capabilities.
More details on Azure Cosmos DB on Azure Stack will follow as we make progress on it.
Thanks for the feedback.
We are happy to announce a gated public preview of an indexer that supports Cosmos DB Gremlin API as a data source.
Request access to the preview here:
More documentation on the preview indexer:
Azure Cognitive Search Product Team
Our apologies for not updating this ask earlier. Renaming Blobs is on our backlog, but is unlikely to be released in the coming year. Today, you can use the “Copy Blob” API as a workaround.
Using the Azure Files service you can address Azure Storage like a network share using the SMB2.1 protocol. This enables usage of normal Windows API’s to rename files and directories. You can get started with the Files service by visiting https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/storage/storage-dotnet-how-to-use-files.
For any further questions, or to discuss your specific scenario, send us an email at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Azure Files services workaround is definitely not what we asked :(. We want a fast and cost effective solution to rename blobs. As someone said, this is an extremely basic feature when it comes to storage.
I understand there are very interesting features being actively developed, but I think such a basic feature should receive a bit more attention (almost 4 years since it was suggested and it is still not planned).
I hope we can see this planned for early 2018 at least ;)
Similar need as the nuget team, I have some files staged in on directory and I need to move them to the final one without a download/upload op
Thank you for your feedback. This ask will be discussed amongst our team to determine if we plan to do this and when. We will provide updates when they become available. For any further questions, or to discuss your specific scenario, send us an email at email@example.com.
You mean you would like to have double encryption since it's not uncrypted (it uses https)?
We understand this is a top customer ask and as such it is currently on our backlog to be prioritized. We will update when the status changes.
Thank you for your feedback. We are currently in public preview of blob storage lifecycle management. The feature set offers a rich, rule-based policy engine which you can use to transition your data to the best access tier and to expire data at the end of its lifecycle. See our post on the Azure Blog to get started: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/azure-blob-storage-lifecycle-management-public-preview/preview/.
For any further questions, or to discuss your specific scenario, send us an email at DLMFeedback@microsoft.com.
this feature has been postponed as it wouldn’t be complete and might be revisited later if standards/supported features by CAs and browsers change (double wildcard certificates are not supported standard, resulting in no way to secure double wildcard domain)