Update: Microsoft will be moving away from UserVoice sites on a product-by-product basis throughout the 2021 calendar year. We will leverage 1st party solutions for customer feedback. Learn more here.

sandor

My feedback

  1. 34 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Azure Container Instances  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    sandor commented  · 

    Since it's a docker feature, I'm pretty sure this is just a matter of exposing some settings just like the mountOptions in AKS. I'm checking the docs regularly hoping it will be resolved, but no luck.

    sandor supported this idea  · 
  2. 420 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    24 comments  ·  Storage » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    sandor commented  · 

    Erf, just wasted a fair bit of time trying to achieve something with azure container instances only to get stuck with that :( so disappointing...

    sandor supported this idea  · 
  3. 206 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  3 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    sandor commented  · 

    shouldn't all rules be configurable?

  4. 1,132 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    57 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    sandor supported this idea  · 
  5. 797 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    8 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    sandor supported this idea  · 
  6. 504 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    25 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    sandor supported this idea  · 
  7. 79 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Service Fabric  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    sandor supported this idea  · 
  8. 511 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    started  ·  24 comments  ·  Azure Backup » Retention and Storage  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    sandor commented  · 

    I think your could have set this one as completed instead of closed.

    The request was to have a colder storage tier with prices equal or lower to amazon Glacier.

    As far as I’m concerned the new Archive tier which is available with prices like 0.002 per Gigabyte is answering that need.

    It is even actually exceeding it as it provide the convenience of the rich blob storage api where Glacier is a complete different Api compared to S3.

    Hope this will help people which might be confused by this status update.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    sandor commented  · 

    And btw comparing cold storage and glacier is a bit unfair since cold storage offers the exact same API as hot storage which is way more convenient than Glacier's vaults.

    sandor supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    sandor commented  · 

    Yes we definitely need a colder, cheaper tier to azure storage, which would allow cheap long term retention of data (in an agnostic way as storage does).

    Glacier is currently 7 euro per To/Month, it is not clear from tarification but it seems it is LRS storage. Azure LRS Cold storage is 8.4 euro per To/Month. This is not a huge difference but it can matter.

    Where Azure could make a big difference with a colder tier would be with GRS cold storage is currently 16.9 euros / To / Month and this is quite prohibitive. I think there might be interesting technical solutions to provide extremely resilient cold storage for a cheaper price (with increased data retrieval costs I guess).

  9. 133 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    sandor supported this idea  · 
  10. 271 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    28 comments  ·  Azure Search » Crawlers  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    sandor supported this idea  · 
  11. 1,228 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    46 comments  ·  Storage » Blobs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Our apologies for not updating this ask earlier. Renaming Blobs is on our backlog, but is unlikely to be released in the coming year. Today, you can use the “Copy Blob” API as a workaround.

    Using the Azure Files service you can address Azure Storage like a network share using the SMB2.1 protocol.  This enables usage of normal Windows API’s to rename files and directories.  You can get started with the Files service by visiting https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/storage/storage-dotnet-how-to-use-files.

    For any further questions, or to discuss your specific scenario, send us an email at azurestoragefeedback@microsoft.com.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    sandor commented  · 

    Azure Files services workaround is definitely not what we asked :(. We want a fast and cost effective solution to rename blobs. As someone said, this is an extremely basic feature when it comes to storage.

    I understand there are very interesting features being actively developed, but I think such a basic feature should receive a bit more attention (almost 4 years since it was suggested and it is still not planned).

    I hope we can see this planned for early 2018 at least ;)

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    sandor commented  · 

    Similar need as the nuget team, I have some files staged in on directory and I need to move them to the final one without a download/upload op

    sandor supported this idea  · 
  12. 22 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Storage » Blobs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    sandor commented  · 

    Interesting suggestion.

    sandor supported this idea  · 
  13. 132 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Storage » Tables  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    sandor supported this idea  · 
  14. 816 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    23 comments  ·  Storage » Tables  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    sandor supported this idea  · 
  15. 891 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    22 comments  ·  Web Apps  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    sandor supported this idea  · 
  16. 182 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    14 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    sandor supported this idea  · 
  17. 252 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    unplanned  ·  9 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    sandor supported this idea  · 
  18. 1,850 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    186 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    sandor supported this idea  · 
  19. 5,701 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    163 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    sandor supported this idea  · 
  20. 504 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    20 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » SQL API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    sandor supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    sandor commented  · 

    It is not currently possible to order results by distance to a point. This makes spatial querying quite limited

← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base