Thanks for your feedback. This is on our backlog.
Is there any update on this issue?
Work on this feature has started. Will update here when this becomes generally available.
Thank you for your suggestion and votes.
Reopening this user voice item as our support for Skip/Take (Offset/Limit) was only limited to single partition queries.
The newly released .NET SDK v3 now includes support for x-partition queries using Offset/Limit. You can learn more about v3 SDK and try it and provide feedback on our github repo here.
We will also be back-porting this functionality to our .NET v2 SDK. This work will begin shortly and we anticipate it to be released in September.
Once that is released we will mark this feature as complete.
Thank you for your patience and votes.
Thanks for the feedback! We are interested in collecting feedback on this request – please vote for it if this is something you like to see.
We’re also interested in learning more what people want to use the SFTP/FTPS for and which protocol they prefer. Please feel free to leave us a comment letting us know more detail!
Program Manager, Azure Files
We've been waiting for this feature for years. We've been running our own Azure VMs to get around this issue to provide SFTP access to blob storage. We absolutely hate maintaining it.
I will gladly throw money at whoever can provide a solution that allows for SFTP access to blobs and the ability to programmatically create user accounts.
Thank you for your feedback, We can look at possibly adding a flag to a job that will automatically delete a successfully completed job.
This is a great idea. Please include a list of the top most generic tasks you would like to see.
We understand this is a top customer ask and as such it is currently on our backlog to be prioritized. We will update when the status changes.
We absolutely need this! Due to the high cost and throughput limitations of DocumentDB it is not a viable alternative to having secondary indexes in table storage.
Very disappointing. Apparently this feature is no longer on the road map.
I agree with the other comments. The horizontal scrolling experience is terrible and not intuitive. I don't see what advantages journeys & blades bring to the table. It fills up my screen with information that I'm not interested in and is distracting. Is the only benefit to prevent your from need to click back? A dashboard with pinnable shortcuts does seem useful though.
At this point our recommendation is to move resources into a new Resource Group with the new name.
We have made some great progress on this idea and most of our services today do support move resources across groups.
We are still working towards 100% support and while we do that it would be great if you can help us prioritize the missing services.
Please file individual asks on each service category present in uservoice and vote for it.
Azure Portal Team
For how important this Resource Group feature seems to be it sure is a mess to use. It's not clear at all how you create, edit, or manage things in them.
This work is on our backlog and currently under consideration. We will update here if this changes.
So... 4 years later. Where are we with Count, Distinct, Contains? Has there been any news at all about Table Storage lately?
Still waiting for this feature guys! It's been over 2 years now. :) I'm specifically waiting for the ability to perform Counts.
Contains would also be VERY useful when trying to perform queries similar to 'Where ID in (1,5,10)' which is not possible right now.
Support for DISTINCT is also needed!
Yes, please add Count!
Perhaps my suggestion is a duplicate of this but I'm not sure -
Good feedback. No plans in this area, yet.
This is especially needed if you run multiple websites within the same WebRole. You can't visit the staging website without having to map a CNAME to the newly created guid url. Very annoying!