Jason

My feedback

  1. 2,823 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    80 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » SQL API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Azure Cosmos DB now supports GROUP BY queries! With GROUP BY, you can run queries that group your results according to the values of one or more specified properties. This feature is currently supported in Data Explorer, JavaScript SDK 3.4, and .NET SDK 3.3. Support for other SDKs will be available later this year.

    Jason supported this idea  · 
  2. 44 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Scheduler » API & SDK  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jason commented  · 

    Is there any update on this issue?

    Jason shared this idea  · 
  3. 4,105 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    87 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » SQL API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jason supported this idea  · 
  4. 3,838 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    128 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Reopening this user voice item as our support for Skip/Take (Offset/Limit) was only limited to single partition queries.

    Update.

    The newly released .NET SDK v3 now includes support for x-partition queries using Offset/Limit. You can learn more about v3 SDK and try it and provide feedback on our github repo here.
    github.com/azure/azure-cosmos-dotnet-v3

    We will also be back-porting this functionality to our .NET v2 SDK. This work will begin shortly and we anticipate it to be released in September.

    Once that is released we will mark this feature as complete.

    Thank you for your patience and votes.

    Jason supported this idea  · 
  5. 4,593 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    182 comments  ·  Storage » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for the feedback! We are interested in collecting feedback on this request – please vote for it if this is something you like to see.

    We’re also interested in learning more what people want to use the SFTP/FTPS for and which protocol they prefer. Please feel free to leave us a comment letting us know more detail!

    Thanks,

    Will Gries
    Program Manager, Azure Files

    Jason commented  · 

    We've been waiting for this feature for years. We've been running our own Azure VMs to get around this issue to provide SFTP access to blob storage. We absolutely hate maintaining it.

    I will gladly throw money at whoever can provide a solution that allows for SFTP access to blobs and the ability to programmatically create user accounts.

    Jason supported this idea  · 
  6. 16 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Scheduler  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Kevin Lam responded

    Mr. Frostlander,
    Thank you for your feedback, We can look at possibly adding a flag to a job that will automatically delete a successfully completed job.

    Regards,
    Kevin

    Jason supported this idea  · 
  7. 6 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Scheduler » Features  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Kevin Lam responded

    This is a great idea. Please include a list of the top most generic tasks you would like to see.

    Jason supported this idea  · 
  8. 236 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  10 comments  ·  Scheduler » Features  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jason supported this idea  · 
  9. 1,383 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    83 comments  ·  Storage » Tables  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jason commented  · 

    We absolutely need this! Due to the high cost and throughput limitations of DocumentDB it is not a viable alternative to having secondary indexes in table storage.

    Jason commented  · 

    Very disappointing. Apparently this feature is no longer on the road map.

  10. 707 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    started  ·  115 comments  ·  Azure portal » Search + navigation  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jason commented  · 

    I agree with the other comments. The horizontal scrolling experience is terrible and not intuitive. I don't see what advantages journeys & blades bring to the table. It fills up my screen with information that I'm not interested in and is distracting. Is the only benefit to prevent your from need to click back? A dashboard with pinnable shortcuts does seem useful though.

    Jason supported this idea  · 
  11. 1,527 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    156 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jason supported this idea  · 
  12. 1,111 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    74 comments  ·  Azure portal » Resource management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hey Folks,

    We have made some great progress on this idea and most of our services today do support move resources across groups.

    We are still working towards 100% support and while we do that it would be great if you can help us prioritize the missing services.

    Please file individual asks on each service category present in uservoice and vote for it.

    Thanks,
    Azure Portal Team

    Jason commented  · 

    For how important this Resource Group feature seems to be it sure is a mess to use. It's not clear at all how you create, edit, or manage things in them.

    Jason supported this idea  · 
  13. 1,679 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    48 comments  ·  Storage » Tables  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jason commented  · 

    So... 4 years later. Where are we with Count, Distinct, Contains? Has there been any news at all about Table Storage lately?

    Jason commented  · 

    Still waiting for this feature guys! It's been over 2 years now. :) I'm specifically waiting for the ability to perform Counts.

    Jason commented  · 

    Contains would also be VERY useful when trying to perform queries similar to 'Where ID in (1,5,10)' which is not possible right now.

    Jason commented  · 

    Support for DISTINCT is also needed!

    Jason commented  · 
    Jason shared this idea  · 
  14. 896 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    16 comments  ·  Cloud Services (Web and Worker Role)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jason commented  · 

    This is especially needed if you run multiple websites within the same WebRole. You can't visit the staging website without having to map a CNAME to the newly created guid url. Very annoying!

Feedback and Knowledge Base