Update: Microsoft will be moving away from UserVoice sites on a product-by-product basis throughout the 2021 calendar year. We will leverage 1st party solutions for customer feedback. Learn more here.

Graeme Miller

My feedback

  1. 231 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    31 comments  ·  Azure Container Instances  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Graeme Miller supported this idea  · 
  2. 112 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    10 comments  ·  Service Bus  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Graeme Miller commented  · 

    3 years and no update? Can we get a status update - this feature makes a lot of scenarios easier

  3. 509 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    37 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Graeme Miller commented  · 

    This would be a great feature to allow for improved Kafka integration with Azure SQL. Change Tracking isn't sufficient for many scenarios

    Graeme Miller supported this idea  · 
  4. 679 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    32 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Graeme Miller supported this idea  · 
  5. 96 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    9 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Graeme Miller supported this idea  · 
  6. 283 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  14 comments  ·  Service Fabric  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  7. 1,094 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  17 comments  ·  Service Fabric  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  8. 392 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  2 comments  ·  Service Fabric  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  9. 418 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Service Fabric  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  10. 88 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  6 comments  ·  API Management » Lifecycle  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Graeme Miller supported this idea  · 
  11. 49 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  1 comment  ·  API Management » Defining APIs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Graeme Miller supported this idea  · 
  12. 135 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  5 comments  ·  API Management » API management experience  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Graeme Miller supported this idea  · 
  13. 88 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    12 comments  ·  Azure Functions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Here’s the latest as there seem to be 2 types of ask here and so two seperate updates. Need comments for if this issue should close to be focused on one or other:

    1. I want to control how many calls my function can make to another API (the 3rd party API rate limiting).
    – In all plans we now have a way to specify the max instances. This can limit how far a function app instance can scale: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-functions/functions-scale#limit-scale-out

    2. I want to stop my function from triggering more than x times an hour.
    Nothing planned in this in the short term. Using API Management for HTTP functions with throttles would be our recommendation for HTTP, nothing out of box for non-HTTP triggers yet.

    Graeme Miller supported this idea  · 
  14. 9 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Azure Functions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Graeme Miller supported this idea  · 
  15. 171 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    10 comments  ·  Azure Functions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Graeme Miller supported this idea  · 
  16. 110 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Azure Functions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Graeme Miller supported this idea  · 
  17. 1,179 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    136 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Graeme Miller supported this idea  · 
  18. 386 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    unplanned  ·  38 comments  ·  Azure Portal » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Graeme Miller supported this idea  · 
  19. 154 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  4 comments  ·  Storage » Tables  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Graeme Miller supported this idea  · 
  20. 209 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  8 comments  ·  Cloud Services (Web and Worker Role)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Graeme Miller commented  · 

    They need to integrate publishing static web files like JS,CSS etc to blob storage as part of the publish operation. This would apps more scableable as statics files wouldn't be served by web roles. It would also allow updates to static files without re-deploying the instance.

← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base