Graeme Miller

My feedback

  1. 168 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  22 comments  ·  Azure Container Instances  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Graeme Miller supported this idea  · 
  2. 95 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    9 comments  ·  Service Bus  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Graeme Miller commented  · 

    3 years and no update? Can we get a status update - this feature makes a lot of scenarios easier

  3. 436 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    34 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Graeme Miller commented  · 

    This would be a great feature to allow for improved Kafka integration with Azure SQL. Change Tracking isn't sufficient for many scenarios

    Graeme Miller supported this idea  · 
  4. 489 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    28 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Graeme Miller supported this idea  · 
  5. 89 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    9 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Graeme Miller supported this idea  · 
  6. 81 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Service Bus  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Graeme Miller supported this idea  · 
  7. 2,255 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    74 comments  ·  Storage » Blobs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your feedback. We are currently in public preview of static website hosting for Azure Storage to enable this scenario. Check out the blog post here for more details: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/azure-storage-static-web-hosting-public-preview. The feature set includes support for default documents and custom error documents for HTTP status code 404.

    For any further questions, or to discuss your specific scenario, send us an email at azurestoragefeedback@microsoft.com.

  8. 78 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Cache » Azure Redis Cache  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Graeme Miller supported this idea  · 
  9. 257 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  11 comments  ·  Service Fabric  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  10. 1,059 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  16 comments  ·  Service Fabric  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  11. 385 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  2 comments  ·  Service Fabric  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  12. 413 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Service Fabric  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  13. 61 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  4 comments  ·  API Management » Lifecycle  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Graeme Miller supported this idea  · 
  14. 38 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  1 comment  ·  API Management » Defining APIs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Graeme Miller supported this idea  · 
  15. 122 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  5 comments  ·  API Management » API management experience  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Graeme Miller supported this idea  · 
  16. 80 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    10 comments  ·  Azure Functions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Moving this work item to unplanned, as it is clear that this request is no for a global throughput limit.

    We do now offer the ability to limit your maximum instances in the Premium plan, which will allow you to avoid swamping downstream resources. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-functions/functions-premium-plan#plan-and-sku-settings

    We prioritized that above a max call per X limit, because our only control to limit throughput is to outright deny some number of requests above a threshold.

    Keep the feedback coming!
    Alex
    Azure Functions Team

    Graeme Miller supported this idea  · 
  17. 8 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Azure Functions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Graeme Miller supported this idea  · 
  18. 152 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    10 comments  ·  Azure Functions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    I’ve gotten a few questions about this item recently, so I just wanted to give a more detailed status. We still have this on the backlog; it hasn’t been forgotten. But we don’t have a clear timeline for when we would get to it right now. The “unplanned” status just means that it can’t be tied to a timeline, but we do think this is a valid request that we would like to have in the product.
    - Matthew

    Graeme Miller supported this idea  · 
  19. 67 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Azure Functions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Graeme Miller supported this idea  · 
  20. 915 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    118 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Graeme Miller supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base