zmorris

My feedback

  1. 72 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Azure Key Vault » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    zmorris supported this idea  · 
  2. 2,819 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    79 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » SQL API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    zmorris supported this idea  · 
  3. 244 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    9 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    zmorris supported this idea  · 
  4. 76 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    zmorris supported this idea  · 
  5. 70 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    zmorris supported this idea  · 
  6. 7 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    zmorris supported this idea  · 
  7. 129 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    8 comments  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    zmorris supported this idea  · 
  8. 263 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    28 comments  ·  Azure Search » Crawlers  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    zmorris supported this idea  · 
  9. 650 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    31 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » Gremlin API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    zmorris supported this idea  · 
  10. 865 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    26 comments  ·  Storage » Blobs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Our apologies for not updating this ask earlier. Renaming Blobs is on our backlog, but is unlikely to be released in the coming year. Today, you can use the “Copy Blob” API as a workaround.

    Using the Azure Files service you can address Azure Storage like a network share using the SMB2.1 protocol.  This enables usage of normal Windows API’s to rename files and directories.  You can get started with the Files service by visiting https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/storage/storage-dotnet-how-to-use-files.

    For any further questions, or to discuss your specific scenario, send us an email at azurestoragefeedback@microsoft.com.

    zmorris supported this idea  · 
  11. 1,086 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    68 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We definitely recognize the popularity of this feature, and we discuss it constantly during the planning phases. However there are certain technical limitations in the system that add a large amount of development cost. Because of the cost and the fact that there is a workaround available, other features get prioritized over this one.

    That being said, please keep voting for it. The popularity of the feature does help bring it up and makes us reconsider every time.

    Apologies for the delay.

    /Parakh


    Old message:
    We’re doing some research both on the specifics of this ask as well as what it would take to support this.
    Is the ask here to do the same thing that regular Azure AD does (see: https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/enterprisemobility/2014/12/18/azure-active-directory-now-with-group-claims-and-application-roles/) or is are there different requirements around this for Azure AD B2C?

    zmorris commented  · 

    Wow. This is the top feature request for B2C - *for years* - and the team is saying that it is not on a roadmap.

    If this most basic feature has a 'large development cost', then someone has seriously messed up in designing this system.

    Please implement asap.

    As the previous poster mentioned, the very little bit of documentation that exists for an actual implementation of a workaround is quite poor and out of date.

    zmorris commented  · 

    Myself and my teams have been *trying* to work with AAD B2C for *years* and this glacial progress has sadly been typical. This is very basic functionality that almost anyone using B2C will run in to almost *immediately* once they try to start using it.

    Please: Be heroes. Disprove the terrible reputation the team behind B2C has earned. Implement this fundamental feature ASAP.

    zmorris supported this idea  · 
  12. 377 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    61 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    zmorris supported this idea  · 
  13. 297 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    35 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    zmorris supported this idea  · 
  14. 1,240 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    144 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » SaaS Applications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We’re continuing to investigate options for adding this support. There are technical challenges to overcome in order to make this happen. We thank you for all your valuable comments so far, and welcome any additional feedback you have on what are the most important use cases involved with these scenarios.

    zmorris supported this idea  · 
  15. 103 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Security and Compliance  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    zmorris shared this idea  · 
  16. 714 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  Security and Compliance  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    zmorris supported this idea  · 
  17. 34 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » Gremlin API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    zmorris shared this idea  · 
  18. 344 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    27 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    zmorris supported this idea  · 
  19. 895 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    113 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    zmorris supported this idea  · 
  20. 110 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » SQL API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your suggestion. This is not currently on our road map.

    As suggested by others, customers are implementing this pattern using the same container with a partition key per tenant or a synthetic key with the tenant id and one or more other properties.

    Will mark this as unplanned and leave open and will revisit this in future planning cycles.

    Thank you for your suggestion and votes.

    zmorris commented  · 

    Agreed that the current pricing structure is not granular enough for multi-tenant SaaS product. Per-collection would be fine if smaller, auto-scaling collection tiers were available. Start cheap, autoscale and pay-for-what-you-use. Just like most other Azure products.

← Previous 1 3 4

Feedback and Knowledge Base