zmorris

My feedback

  1. 82 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Azure Key Vault » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    zmorris supported this idea  · 
  2. 2,831 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    91 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » SQL API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Azure Cosmos DB now supports GROUP BY queries! With GROUP BY, you can run queries that group your results according to the values of one or more specified properties. This feature is currently supported in Data Explorer, JavaScript SDK 3.4, and .NET SDK 3.3. Support for other SDKs will be available later this year.

    zmorris supported this idea  · 
  3. 269 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    11 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    zmorris supported this idea  · 
  4. 84 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    zmorris supported this idea  · 
  5. 68 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    zmorris supported this idea  · 
  6. 7 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    zmorris supported this idea  · 
  7. 143 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    9 comments  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    zmorris supported this idea  · 
  8. 267 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    28 comments  ·  Azure Search » Crawlers  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    zmorris supported this idea  · 
  9. 731 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    32 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » Gremlin API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Update on this item.

    Bytecode implementation is now targeting the first half of 2020 to provide stability and performance improvements in the platform.

    Apologies for the delay. We are continuing to work on this. Will announce here when this becomes available.

    Thanks.

    zmorris supported this idea  · 
  10. 908 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    29 comments  ·  Storage » Blobs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Our apologies for not updating this ask earlier. Renaming Blobs is on our backlog, but is unlikely to be released in the coming year. Today, you can use the “Copy Blob” API as a workaround.

    Using the Azure Files service you can address Azure Storage like a network share using the SMB2.1 protocol.  This enables usage of normal Windows API’s to rename files and directories.  You can get started with the Files service by visiting https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/storage/storage-dotnet-how-to-use-files.

    For any further questions, or to discuss your specific scenario, send us an email at azurestoragefeedback@microsoft.com.

    zmorris supported this idea  · 
  11. 1,180 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    72 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We definitely recognize the popularity of this feature, and we discuss it constantly during the planning phases. However there are certain technical limitations in the system that add a large amount of development cost. Because of the cost and the fact that there is a workaround available, other features get prioritized over this one.

    That being said, please keep voting for it. The popularity of the feature does help bring it up and makes us reconsider every time.

    Apologies for the delay.

    /Parakh


    Old message:
    We’re doing some research both on the specifics of this ask as well as what it would take to support this.
    Is the ask here to do the same thing that regular Azure AD does (see: https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/enterprisemobility/2014/12/18/azure-active-directory-now-with-group-claims-and-application-roles/) or is are there different requirements around this for Azure AD B2C?

    zmorris commented  · 

    Wow. This is the top feature request for B2C - *for years* - and the team is saying that it is not on a roadmap.

    If this most basic feature has a 'large development cost', then someone has seriously messed up in designing this system.

    Please implement asap.

    As the previous poster mentioned, the very little bit of documentation that exists for an actual implementation of a workaround is quite poor and out of date.

    zmorris commented  · 

    Myself and my teams have been *trying* to work with AAD B2C for *years* and this glacial progress has sadly been typical. This is very basic functionality that almost anyone using B2C will run in to almost *immediately* once they try to start using it.

    Please: Be heroes. Disprove the terrible reputation the team behind B2C has earned. Implement this fundamental feature ASAP.

    zmorris supported this idea  · 
  12. 1,434 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    161 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » SaaS Applications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We’re continuing to investigate options for adding this support. There are technical challenges to overcome in order to make this happen. We thank you for all your valuable comments so far, and welcome any additional feedback you have on what are the most important use cases involved with these scenarios.

    zmorris supported this idea  · 
  13. 116 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Security and Compliance  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    zmorris shared this idea  · 
  14. 806 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  Security and Compliance  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    zmorris supported this idea  · 
  15. 34 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » Gremlin API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    zmorris shared this idea  · 
  16. 353 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    29 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    zmorris supported this idea  · 
  17. 955 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    121 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    zmorris supported this idea  · 
  18. 113 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » SQL API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your suggestion. This is not currently on our road map.

    As suggested by others, customers are implementing this pattern using the same container with a partition key per tenant or a synthetic key with the tenant id and one or more other properties.

    Will mark this as unplanned and leave open and will revisit this in future planning cycles.

    Thank you for your suggestion and votes.

    zmorris commented  · 

    Agreed that the current pricing structure is not granular enough for multi-tenant SaaS product. Per-collection would be fine if smaller, auto-scaling collection tiers were available. Start cheap, autoscale and pay-for-what-you-use. Just like most other Azure products.

  19. 28 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Azure Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    zmorris supported this idea  · 
  20. 1,411 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    39 comments  ·  Azure Search » Pricing and Quotas  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    zmorris supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1 3

Feedback and Knowledge Base