Jamie Thomson

My feedback

  1. 4,034 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    163 comments  ·  Storage » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for the feedback! We are interested in collecting feedback on this request – please vote for it if this is something you like to see.

    We’re also interested in learning more what people want to use the SFTP/FTPS for and which protocol they prefer. Please feel free to leave us a comment letting us know more detail!

    Thanks,

    Will Gries
    Program Manager, Azure Files

    Jamie Thomson commented  · 

    Nearly 5 years on and we still don't have this most simple of features. I accept there needs to be feature prioritization and that I shouldn't expect Microsoft to simply implement what I want but come one....this is surely a no-brainer.

    Jamie Thomson supported this idea  · 
    Jamie Thomson commented  · 

    I totally agree with this and am shocked that its not available. We have a B2B app that we are considering migrating to Azure and our clients send us data files via SFTP - right now I don't know of an easy way to enable upload data into Azure BLOB storage via SFTP.

    As far as I'm concerned, given Azure is a PAAS offering, this should simply be a case of checking an "Enable FTP/SFTP access" check box on the Azure portal. Please make this happen.

    Jamie Thomson commented  · 

    I totally agree with this and am surprised it only has one vote. We have a B2B app that we are considering migrating to Azure and our clients send us data files via SFTP - right now I don't know of an easy way to enable upload data into Azure BLOB storage via SFTP.
    As far as I'm concerned, given Azure is a PAAS offering, this should simply be a case of checking an "Enable FTP/SFTP access" check box on the Azure portal. Please make this happen.

  2. 1,191 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Folks,

    Thanks for the questions and suggestions. And apologies for not sharing any update on this thread for so long. We’ve been working on this problem and have announced changes on our official team blog (see here: https://cloudblogs.microsoft.com/enterprisemobility/2016/09/15/cleaning-up-the-azure-ad-and-microsoft-account-overlap/).

    First, we are acutely aware of the UX pain this is causing and we are sorry for this. We are trying to undo a decade and a half of systems divergence. There are literally hundreds of different engineering teams across Microsoft involved in this effort. So this is taking time.

    Second, we can’t easily “merge” two accounts, or allow IT to “take over” personal Microsoft accounts. There are two main hurdles: (1) The terms of service are fundamentally different for the two account types and (2) they are based on different technologies with different stacks (different identifiers, SDKs, token formats, etc.). We’re working to converge the two stacks but again this…

    Jamie Thomson commented  · 

    To all those who say Microsoft are ignoring this issue (or say things like "no one hears your screams or cares") this might be worth reading

    https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/enterprisemobility/2016/09/15/cleaning-up-the-azure-ad-and-microsoft-account-overlap/

    Jamie Thomson supported this idea  · 
    Jamie Thomson commented  · 

    I'm half-amused to see people here opine that this problem has existed for "almost a year" because to my mind its been a problem for much much longer than that. Lots of discussion here about Azure and the Azure Management Portal and various other services/web properties at Microsoft but I think the original poster captured it better than anyone. Two separate accounts (with two separate passwords) for the same email address is (at best) very very confusing, especially for non-techies. I totally understand the historical reasons for why this situation has arisen but surely the time has passed for it to be sorted out?

    I'd like to ask if there's a reason why Microsoft can't do what the original poster suggested i.e. merge Organisational accounts & Microsoft Accounts (MSA) that have the same email address. Other than "it'd be a heck of a lot of work" is there a technical reason that simply prohibits this from being done? I'd definitely like to know the answer to that because (IMHO) merging such accounts would solve most if not all of the frustrations I currently have regarding this whole mess.

  3. 1,218 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    46 comments  ·  Additional Services  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jamie Thomson commented  · 

    Hi Ron (and everyone else),
    My betting is this is never going to happen now that Power BI data can be accessed directly from Excel using the same protocols for accessing SSAS.

    Arguably Power BI now *is* SSAS in the cloud, a pure PaaS play.

    Jamie Thomson supported this idea  · 
  4. 2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Automation » Debugging and troubleshooting  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Beth Cooper responded

    Thanks for the feedback. Would you be able to provide the repro steps for this/explain the root cause? We can look into improving this behavior.

    Jamie Thomson commented  · 

    Hi Beth,
    I'm sorry, I don't recall. My bad, I'm usually (fairly) diligent about collecting evidence for things like this - guess I was busy at the time or something. My apologies.

    Jamie Thomson shared this idea  · 
  5. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Automation » Scheduling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jamie Thomson commented  · 

    How about exposing all schedules via iCalendar (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICalendar) so that I can subscribe to and view them wherever I wish? Outlook, Outlook.com, GMail, Apple iCal etc... all support subscribing to iCalendar feeds.

  6. 5 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Automation » Scheduling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Beth Cooper responded

    That’s an interesting idea – thanks for the feedback. We can look into it.

    In the meantime, you could probably work around this. I’m not exactly sure what your runbook looks like, but it might make sense to create the schedule with the same name each time, then when the runbook starts again to delete that schedule, then to create it again at the end.

    Jamie Thomson commented  · 

    Thanks Beth, that's not a bad idea.

    Jamie Thomson shared this idea  · 
  7. 39 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Automation » Source control integration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jamie Thomson commented  · 

    After discussion with Joe Levy (http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsdesktop/en-US/967113a6-bc4c-460a-a3b1-6558d4080d2a/continuous-deployment-of-runbooks?forum=azureautomation) I conccur with his thoughts that ARM templates would probably be more suitable in this scenario.

    Jamie Thomson supported this idea  · 
    Jamie Thomson shared this idea  · 
  8. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  HDInsight  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jamie Thomson shared this idea  · 
  9. 1,149 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    46 comments  ·  HDInsight » Platform  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    [Update] Thanks for your continued feedback on this capability! Rest assured that we are tracking this request closely along with several other platform capabilities our customers have requested. In the meanwhile, you can leverage cluster scaling capability to adjust HDInsight cluster size according to your varying compute needs. Azure Data Factory is another option you can explore for scheduling jobs with automatic creation and deletion of clusters: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/articles/data-factory-data-transformation-activities/

    Adnan Ijaz
    Program Manager
    Microsoft Azure HDInsight

    Jamie Thomson supported this idea  · 
    Jamie Thomson commented  · 

    Great idea. Similarly I'd like to be able to scale my cluster up or down (i.e. add or remove data nodes).

  10. 10 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Storage » Tables  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jamie Thomson shared this idea  · 
  11. 1,377 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    83 comments  ·  Storage » Tables  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jamie Thomson commented  · 

    Not just so that we can sort on it but so we can filter on it too.

    Jamie Thomson supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base