Update: Microsoft will be moving away from UserVoice sites on a product-by-product basis throughout the 2021 calendar year. We will leverage 1st party solutions for customer feedback. Learn more here.

Jonas Stawski

My feedback

  1. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Key Vault » Managing application secrets  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jonas Stawski supported this idea  · 
  2. 13 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » Portal  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jonas Stawski commented  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jonas Stawski commented  · 
    Jonas Stawski shared this idea  · 
  3. 162 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » SQL API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jonas Stawski supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jonas Stawski commented  · 

    The following query doesn't work either and it is a similar issue:

    select c.id, t.value
    from c
    join t IN c.things
    order by t.value desc

    It results in the error Order-By over correlated collections is not supported

  4. 9 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Logic Apps » Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jonas Stawski shared this idea  · 
  5. 250 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Azure Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jonas Stawski commented  · 

    Since we can't scale up, at the very list you should have the option to import a search index from another account/service

    Jonas Stawski supported this idea  · 
  6. 9 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Azure Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jonas Stawski supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jonas Stawski commented  · 

    WTF?!?!?! We just hit a storage limit in the Basic tier and found out that we can't scale up! Most services in Azure allow you to scale up and out, why wouldn't this one support it? To make matters worse, we can't import data from another azure search service/account. Come on! This should be implemented right away regardless of the number of votes, this is what the cloud is all about, pay only for what you use! What scares me the most is what will happen when I reach the next limit....

  7. 166 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Azure Search » Query - Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jonas Stawski commented  · 

    Agree 100% with Harold Perry!

    Jonas Stawski supported this idea  · 
  8. 173 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Azure Search » Query - Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your feedback. While it is unlikely we’ll address this suggestion in the near future, we’ll reassess based on the number of votes it receives.

    There are a few ways you can do this currently in code per document, for example (https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6544286/calculate-distance-of-two-geo-points-in-km-c-sharp). But we are considering how we might make it available as a document property.

    Thanks,
    Vinod
    Azure Search Product Team

    Jonas Stawski supported this idea  · 
  9. 503 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    20 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » SQL API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jonas Stawski supported this idea  · 
  10. 109 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Data Factory  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jonas Stawski supported this idea  · 
  11. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Portal » Resource management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jonas Stawski supported this idea  · 
  12. 251 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    22 comments  ·  Azure Portal » Resource management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jonas Stawski supported this idea  · 
  13. 5,664 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    160 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jonas Stawski supported this idea  · 
  14. 516 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    8 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » SQL API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your feedback. I have discussed this in more detail with our team.

    You are correct the workaround suggested to use .AsEnumerable().FirstOrDefault(). should not be a recommended work around. This way results in materializing all documents on the client first before getting the 1st document, which is not very efficient and the exact opposite of what you are trying to achieve.

    Instead we recommend you use Take(1).AsEnumerable() and then .First() or .Single() or .FirstOrDefault() for Single() and First(). Take(1) is translated to SELECT TOP 1 and is processed server-side so more efficient than the previous suggestion and is what you are trying to achieve.

    As to the original ask. The support for these operations can be done, but this work is not prioritized against the other work we want to deliver. I will move this back as unplanned but please note this is on our roadmap.

    Thanks again…

    Jonas Stawski supported this idea  · 
  15. 12 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jonas Stawski shared this idea  · 
  16. 6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Cloud Services (Web and Worker Role)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jonas Stawski shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base