Steffen Gammelgård

My feedback

  1. 100 votes
    Sign in
    Check!
    (thinking…)
    Reset
    or sign in with
    • facebook
    • google
      Password icon
      Signed in as (Sign out)

      We’ll send you updates on this idea

      10 comments  ·  Azure Functions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

      We’re moving this back to the unplanned status, as the started work was not completed, and we don’t have a current ETA.

      We’ll update the status again once we have more information. This is still an item we’d like to do at some point.

      - Matthew

      Steffen Gammelgård commented  · 

      Sortof agree with this, but simply validating tokens issued by my applications is fairly straight forward in a function, as long as the function has a signing key. -with RSA that should even just be a public key, so not that bad.

      What would be really neat would be something like asp.net identity, only with bearer tokens and tablestorage, where i simply supply a few basic settings and configuration of endpoints (change password, password reset, get token, the usual account management stuff that we usually dont need to touch)
      Rolling my own isnt really difficult, just tedius and not as easily reusable. (mostly because of the way we deploy to Functions right now, which for me has been writing code directly in the browser)

    • 3,785 votes
      Vote
      Sign in
      Check!
      (thinking…)
      Reset
      or sign in with
      • facebook
      • google
        Password icon
        Signed in as (Sign out)
        You have left! (?) (thinking…)
        106 comments  ·  Storage » Blobs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

        You can now use the Azure CDN to access blobs with custom domains over HTTPS. See the following article for instructions on how to do so: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/storage/storage-https-custom-domain-cdn. Having talked to a number of customers, we concluded that this solution addresses many scenarios where the need for HTTPS access to blobs with custom domains exists.

        Native Azure Storage support for using SSL to access blobs at custom domains is still on our backlog. We would love to hear about your scenarios where using the Azure CDN is not an acceptable solution, either by posting on this thread or sending us an email at azurestoragefeedback@microsoft.com.

        Steffen Gammelgård commented  · 

        Agree wholeheartedly with the last few comments, I also have a SPA and an API on Functions, and hope "BACKLOG" actually means it's a priority feature.

        Putting a static site on App Service seems like a waste of money, but hopefully it will do OK with Cloudflare and an agressive caching strategy until this feature is ready.

        Steffen Gammelgård supported this idea  · 
      • 2,064 votes
        Vote
        Sign in
        Check!
        (thinking…)
        Reset
        or sign in with
        • facebook
        • google
          Password icon
          Signed in as (Sign out)
          You have left! (?) (thinking…)
          62 comments  ·  Storage » Blobs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
          Steffen Gammelgård commented  · 

          This is simply a necessary feature for costeffective hosting of singlepage applications. unless ofcourse we like **** routes like [blobaddress]/index.html/#/[Something]/[SomethingElse]

          Considering it's there in Google Cloud Storage AND Amazon AWS S3 it should make sense to make it here too.

          I did in fact look into altertative ways to get the functionality (through a CDN) but no luck.
          I guess there is no problem in hosting the singlepage application from Amazon or Google with a backend somewhere in Azure, but it just shouldn't be necessary

          Steffen Gammelgård supported this idea  · 
        • 2,749 votes
          Vote
          Sign in
          Check!
          (thinking…)
          Reset
          or sign in with
          • facebook
          • google
            Password icon
            Signed in as (Sign out)
            You have left! (?) (thinking…)
            30 comments  ·  Additional Services » Key Vault  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
            Steffen Gammelgård supported this idea  · 
          • 1,345 votes
            Vote
            Sign in
            Check!
            (thinking…)
            Reset
            or sign in with
            • facebook
            • google
              Password icon
              Signed in as (Sign out)
              You have left! (?) (thinking…)
              81 comments  ·  Storage » Tables  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
              Steffen Gammelgård commented  · 

              Hope the secondary index is still coming.

              Azure Table Storage is an immensely powerful platform, and is already an exceptionally cost effective NoSQL database for certain kinds of applications.

              Being able to add a secondary index would drastically reduce the complexity and the amount of redundant data in certain scenarios and would make an already awesome platform relevant for even more projects.

              I too have used index tables to get secondary indicies and sometimes that would still be necessary to allow for efficient partitioning, but having a second index still seems like it would be very useful!

              Steffen Gammelgård supported this idea  · 

            Feedback and Knowledge Base