Peter Lillevold

My feedback

  1. 11 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Networking » DNS  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Peter Lillevold commented  · 

    With the introduction of Azure Storage Websites we're serving static web content with Azure CDN in front of Storage Websites. Our final missing piece is being able to serve this from the apex of our custom domain. Please add Azure CDN to the list of Azure resources supported by DNS alias records. We're fine with you only supporting Microsoft CDN, if that makes it easier to implement :)
    If this isn't being implemented in Azure DNS, we would have to look at other DNS vendors out there that fully support aliasing at the domain apex.

    Peter Lillevold supported this idea  · 
  2. 8 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Web Apps » Supportability  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Peter Lillevold supported this idea  · 
  3. 4,616 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    142 comments  ·  Storage » Blobs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    You can now use the Azure CDN to access blobs with custom domains over HTTPS. See the following article for instructions on how to do so: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/storage/storage-https-custom-domain-cdn. Having talked to a number of customers, we concluded that this solution addresses many scenarios where the need for HTTPS access to blobs with custom domains exists.

    Native Azure Storage support for using SSL to access blobs at custom domains is still on our backlog. We would love to hear about your scenarios where using the Azure CDN is not an acceptable solution, either by posting on this thread or sending us an email at azurestoragefeedback@microsoft.com.

    Peter Lillevold commented  · 

    Native Azure Storage support for using SSL to access blobs at custom domains makes even more sense now, in combination with the static websites feature. We could use this as the primary serving point for many of our web sites.

    Peter Lillevold supported this idea  · 
  4. 350 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    unplanned  ·  37 comments  ·  Azure portal » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Peter Lillevold supported this idea  · 
  5. 92 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  17 comments  ·  Data Lake  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Peter Lillevold supported this idea  · 
  6. 39 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Azure IoT  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Peter Lillevold supported this idea  · 
  7. 14 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure Active Directory » Developer Experiences  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Peter Lillevold shared this idea  · 
  8. 6 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Stream Analytics  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Peter Lillevold supported this idea  · 
    Peter Lillevold commented  · 

    There is currently a known issue (inside MS at least) with ASA output to partitioned DocumentDB collections with RUs less than 10100. A fix is currently in development. I'm waiting for feedback from MS now on when the fix is scheduled for release.

    Related to this feedback as well: https://feedback.azure.com/forums/270577-stream-analytics/suggestions/13431888-output-new-documentdb-single-partition-partition

  9. 92 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  3 comments  ·  Service Fabric  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Peter Lillevold supported this idea  · 
  10. 166 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    16 comments  ·  Storage » AzCopy  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your feedback. We would like to get more feedback about this item before we prioritize. Is the ask here to replicate a storage account on-demand ? Or have a mechanism to always keep two or more storage accounts in sync ?

    Meanwhile, to unblock some of our users we have published a sample that copies blobs from an account to another account: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/storage/scripts/storage-common-transfer-between-storage-accounts?toc=%2fpowershell%2fmodule%2ftoc.json

    Peter Lillevold commented  · 

    This was "Started" in 2014. What is the status on Table storage duplication?

    Peter Lillevold supported this idea  · 
  11. 368 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    61 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Peter Lillevold supported this idea  · 
  12. 562 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  11 comments  ·  Azure Search » Indexing  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Peter Lillevold supported this idea  · 
  13. 984 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    48 comments  ·  Azure portal » Resource management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hey Folks,

    We have made some great progress on this idea and most of our services today do support move resources across groups.

    We are still working towards 100% support and while we do that it would be great if you can help us prioritize the missing services.

    Please file individual asks on each service category present in uservoice and vote for it.

    Thanks,
    Azure Portal Team

    Peter Lillevold supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base