alvipeo
My feedback
-
1,716 votes
We definitely recognize the popularity of this feature, and we discuss it constantly during the planning phases. However there are certain technical limitations in the system that add a large amount of development cost. Because of the cost and the fact that there is a workaround available, other features get prioritized over this one.
That being said, please keep voting for it. The popularity of the feature does help bring it up and makes us reconsider every time.
Apologies for the delay.
/Parakh
Old message:
We’re doing some research both on the specifics of this ask as well as what it would take to support this.
Is the ask here to do the same thing that regular Azure AD does (see: https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/enterprisemobility/2014/12/18/azure-active-directory-now-with-group-claims-and-application-roles/) or is are there different requirements around this for Azure AD B2C?An error occurred while saving the comment alvipeo
supported this idea
·
-
114 votes
Azure Automation has a service tag support for hybrid jobs : https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/automation/automation-hybrid-runbook-worker#service-tags . We are planning to bring in service tag support for cloud jobs too.
alvipeo
supported this idea
·
-
47 votesalvipeo
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment alvipeo
commented
Guys, WE NEED IT! We recently created en environment and our devs use SMTP.GMAIL.COM:587, there are push notification services for Apple and Android. Those are on completely different ports!
And we will have PCI compliance certification!
-
1 votealvipeo
shared this idea
·
-
0 votesalvipeo
shared this idea
·
-
141 votes
Our long-term goal is to have every service within Azure publish events, however, we have yet to begin work on this one.
As always, we’re passing the feedback along, but make sure you reach out to Storage as well so they hear your voice directly!
alvipeo
supported this idea
·
-
10 votes
This is under review by the AMP team. Thank you for your feedback.
alvipeo
supported this idea
·
-
21 votesunder review · 1 comment · Azure Media Services » Azure Media Player · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →alvipeo
supported this idea
·
-
148 votes
We will review this request.
alvipeo
supported this idea
·
-
15 votesplanned · 2 comments · Networking » Content Delivery Network · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
An error occurred while saving the comment alvipeo
commented
still planned?
An error occurred while saving the comment alvipeo
commented
Guys, any updates on this?
alvipeo
supported this idea
·
-
187 votes
Thank you for your feedback. We are currently in public preview of blob storage lifecycle management. The feature set offers a rich, rule-based policy engine which you can use to transition your data to the best access tier and to expire data at the end of its lifecycle. This framework can be used to match and tier blobs based on prefix to enable batch archiving of an account, containers, or even virtual directories. Having talked to a number of customers, we concluded that this solution addresses many scenarios where the need for account and container level archiving exists. See our post on the Azure Blog to get started: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/azure-blob-storage-lifecycle-management-public-preview/preview/.
For any further questions, or to discuss your specific scenario, send us an email at DLMFeedback@microsoft.com.
An error occurred while saving the comment alvipeo
commented
Any updates on this?
-
230 votes
This is not planned for the next 6 months, but is on the roadmap.
/Parakh
alvipeo
supported this idea
·
-
1 votealvipeo
shared this idea
·
-
1 votealvipeo
shared this idea
·
-
1 votealvipeo
shared this idea
·
-
358 votes
Thank you for your patience. This is still under review. We are working on other features that are moving us closer to being able to provide these capabilities, but cannot yet dedicate resources to this feature.
Thanks,
Bridget [MSFT]An error occurred while saving the comment alvipeo
commented
That shouldn't be even under review! That's essential - the client gets inside a perimeter via VPN (to RDP to their VMs) and no one knows who, when, from where logged in???
alvipeo
supported this idea
·
-
21 votesalvipeo
shared this idea
·
-
20 votesalvipeo
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment alvipeo
commented
Or better yet, it should use Azure AD.
-
370 votes
Hi there,
We are still waiting on a few internal dependencies before we can complete this request.
Thanks,
Odedalvipeo
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesalvipeo
shared this idea
·
Still Under Review for 2 years????????