Horizon_Net

My feedback

  1. 52 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  Stream Analytics  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Horizon_Net supported this idea  · 
  2. 166 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  10 comments  ·  Stream Analytics » Inputs and Outputs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Horizon_Net supported this idea  · 
  3. 243 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  SDK and Tools » .NET  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Horizon_Net supported this idea  · 
  4. 1,192 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    46 comments  ·  HDInsight » Platform  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    [Update] Thanks for your continued feedback on this capability! Rest assured that we are tracking this request closely along with several other platform capabilities our customers have requested. In the meanwhile, you can leverage cluster scaling capability to adjust HDInsight cluster size according to your varying compute needs. Azure Data Factory is another option you can explore for scheduling jobs with automatic creation and deletion of clusters: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/articles/data-factory-data-transformation-activities/

    Adnan Ijaz
    Program Manager
    Microsoft Azure HDInsight

    Horizon_Net supported this idea  · 
  5. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  SDK and Tools  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Horizon_Net supported this idea  · 
  6. 20 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    unplanned  ·  1 comment  ·  Azure portal » Resource management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Horizon_Net supported this idea  · 
  7. 248 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    unplanned  ·  7 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Horizon_Net supported this idea  · 
  8. 9 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  SDK and Tools » SDK  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    started  ·  Brady Gaster responded

    In addition, the ADX team has started an effort to unify our client SDK story. Our recent release of the Windows Azure Management Libraries makes use of a pre-release SDK common underpinning. This has been released as a NuGet package here. You’ll notice this has been released as a PCL. Though this will expose the core SDK common functionality to any PCL-compliant platform, there are a few caveats on which we’re working, specifically around authentication. Since RT and Windows Phone 8 have no support for the X509Certificate2 class, which the Common package uses, we’re in the process of rolling a credential that supports the AAD authentication paradigm. We’re in the process of working on this, and I’ll use this forum to provide updates. Here’s the Common NuGet package ADX is using throughout the management libraries, and that we plan on using in other areas where appropriate: http://www.nuget.org/packages/Microsoft.WindowsAzure.Common

    Horizon_Net supported this idea  · 
  9. 57 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  SDK and Tools  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Brady Gaster responded

    We are currently investigating the opportunities around shipping more features as NuGet packages. We have opened up far more areas as NuGet packages than in previous releases. That said, the idea of creating a NuGet package that contains the emulator is a large effort. As we progress towards this goal or realize that it isn’t possible I’ll update the forum thread.

    For the time being, rest assured we’ve heard this comment, which has been echoed by the larger Windows Azure community. As an Azure developer myself I find merit in this request and feel there is a good chance it could eventually be realized.

    Horizon_Net supported this idea  · 
  10. 9 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Additional Services  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Horizon_Net commented  · 

    If you need something that gets you started really quickly you should have a look at the Mobile Services, which can be used for most of the requirements of game developers.

  11. 342 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    24 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    The status of this item has been moved back to Under Review. We initially planned to move to VHDX support as part of our support for HyperV Gen2 VMs, but we ended up using the VHD format for Gen2 VMs as well. Some aspects of the Azure Infrastructure do not cleanly support VHDX OS or data disks. So this feature is dependent on some of these internal services being updated which is an ongoing process.

    Horizon_Net shared this idea  · 
  12. 2,849 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    173 comments  ·  Signup and Billing  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Quick update,

    We have been considering all of the risks and investigating the steps required to ensure we implement this feature with high positive impact and low to no negative impact.

    After this investigation we have decided we will enable Pay-As-You-Go customers the option to configure a spending limit on a Pay-As-You-Go subscription, with appropriate safeguards and measures to prevent both service abuse and production service failure.

    We have not yet finished determining the details of what this feature will look like, nor do we have a timeline for release, but we have heard your voices and have added this feature to our backlog.

    Thanks for your continued feedback,

    -Adam (Azure Billing Team)

    Horizon_Net supported this idea  · 
  13. 168 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    23 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Horizon_Net supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base