This is currently not on our roadmap. You can retrieve this value by making a call through the Graph API. If this is needed for your scenarios, please continue voting and we will review at a later date.
This is something we’re looking to enable.
Still unplanned, but please keep the votes coming!
Support for creating a container in ARM templates is now done. We have begun work to support Tables and Queues.
Here is a link to a sample template to create a container: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/resources/templates/101-storage-blob-container/
The Azure Resource Manager team is actively investigating the scenarios around renaming resource groups. To help us better understand the use-cases and to determine which implementations may be viable to address the problem, we would appreciate if you could fill out this 3-minute survey:
This item was incorrectly marked as started. Actual work on this item has been deferred but is still planned.
Will update when this work is started.
This is an awesome idea, and we’re exploring a few options to make it a reality.
However, the 600 connection limit per instance should be enough for most applications if you’re reusing or closing connections. If you truly need 600 open connections you are likely to run into the 10 minute timeout per execution.
Even after we add this you will still need to be mindful of your connection management.
Keep the votes coming!
This is now available in the latest Service Bus trigger version: https://github.com/Azure/azure-functions-servicebus-extension/issues/15
Just tracking another issue to ensure can be leveraged outside of .NET https://github.com/Azure/azure-functions-servicebus-extension/issues/65
I’ve gotten a few questions about this item recently, so I just wanted to give a more detailed status. We still have this on the backlog; it hasn’t been forgotten. But we don’t have a clear timeline for when we would get to it right now. The “unplanned” status just means that it can’t be tied to a timeline, but we do think this is a valid request that we would like to have in the product.
We have a private preview of this feature available. If you are interested in joining, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org with the name of your tenant.
An error occurred while saving the commentAdrian Gawor commented
After getting preview: When setting to predefined Strong or Simple it works ok, but Custom seems to have problem with being applied. After switch to Custom (for instance 10-64 chars, and all 4 char classes required) and visiting sing up page, previously applied (Simple or Strong whichever was before) is still in power.
We definitely recognize the popularity of this feature, and we discuss it constantly during the planning phases. However there are certain technical limitations in the system that add a large amount of development cost. Because of the cost and the fact that there is a workaround available, other features get prioritized over this one.
That being said, please keep voting for it. The popularity of the feature does help bring it up and makes us reconsider every time.
Apologies for the delay.
We’re doing some research both on the specifics of this ask as well as what it would take to support this.
Is the ask here to do the same thing that regular Azure AD does (see: https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/enterprisemobility/2014/12/18/azure-active-directory-now-with-group-claims-and-application-roles/) or is are there different requirements around this for Azure AD B2C?
Twitter is now in public preview! It should be available as one of the identity providers in your Azure AD B2C tenant. Here are the instructions to get setup – https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory-b2c/active-directory-b2c-setup-twitter-app.
Check it out and let us know if you have any feedback!
Could you elaborate more on the use case for this?
Due to various technical limitations, the first iteration of the customer-owned domains functionality will not be available for a few more months. We will provide an update as soon as we can get a more specific ETA.
We continue evaluating several alternatives to provide full email customization. We are actively working on an alternative.
Unfortunately we do no yet have an ETA.