Adrian Gawor

My feedback

  1. 138 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    24 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Adrian Gawor supported this idea  · 
  2. 27 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Azure Functions » Feature  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Adrian Gawor supported this idea  · 
  3. 106 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    13 comments  ·  Azure Functions » Feature  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Adrian Gawor supported this idea  · 
  4. 251 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    unplanned  ·  7 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Adrian Gawor supported this idea  · 
  5. 789 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    65 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Adrian Gawor supported this idea  · 
  6. 1,638 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    170 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Adrian Gawor supported this idea  · 
  7. 414 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    17 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » SQL API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Adrian Gawor supported this idea  · 
  8. 35 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Azure Functions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    This is an awesome idea, and we’re exploring a few options to make it a reality.
    However, the 600 connection limit per instance should be enough for most applications if you’re reusing or closing connections. If you truly need 600 open connections you are likely to run into the 10 minute timeout per execution.
    Even after we add this you will still need to be mindful of your connection management.

    Keep the votes coming!
    —Alex

    Adrian Gawor supported this idea  · 
  9. 60 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Azure Functions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Adrian Gawor supported this idea  · 
  10. 162 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    10 comments  ·  Azure Functions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    I’ve gotten a few questions about this item recently, so I just wanted to give a more detailed status. We still have this on the backlog; it hasn’t been forgotten. But we don’t have a clear timeline for when we would get to it right now. The “unplanned” status just means that it can’t be tied to a timeline, but we do think this is a valid request that we would like to have in the product.
    - Matthew

    Adrian Gawor supported this idea  · 
  11. 110 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    15 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Adrian Gawor commented  · 

    After getting preview: When setting to predefined Strong or Simple it works ok, but Custom seems to have problem with being applied. After switch to Custom (for instance 10-64 chars, and all 4 char classes required) and visiting sing up page, previously applied (Simple or Strong whichever was before) is still in power.

  12. 1,357 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    77 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We definitely recognize the popularity of this feature, and we discuss it constantly during the planning phases. However there are certain technical limitations in the system that add a large amount of development cost. Because of the cost and the fact that there is a workaround available, other features get prioritized over this one.

    That being said, please keep voting for it. The popularity of the feature does help bring it up and makes us reconsider every time.

    Apologies for the delay.

    /Parakh


    Old message:
    We’re doing some research both on the specifics of this ask as well as what it would take to support this.
    Is the ask here to do the same thing that regular Azure AD does (see: https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/enterprisemobility/2014/12/18/azure-active-directory-now-with-group-claims-and-application-roles/) or is are there different requirements around this for Azure AD B2C?

    Adrian Gawor supported this idea  · 
  13. 84 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Service Fabric  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Adrian Gawor supported this idea  · 
  14. 86 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Service Fabric  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Adrian Gawor supported this idea  · 
  15. 218 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Service Fabric  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Adrian Gawor supported this idea  · 
  16. 131 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Service Fabric  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Adrian Gawor supported this idea  · 
  17. 30 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Adrian Gawor supported this idea  · 
  18. 63 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Adrian Gawor supported this idea  · 
  19. 808 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    119 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Due to various technical limitations, the first iteration of the customer-owned domains functionality will not be available for a few more months. We will provide an update as soon as we can get a more specific ETA.

    If you are looking to use custom domains to use javascript, we are now looking to enable that experience by providing a new (non-customizable) domain. Please look for updates here: https://feedback.azure.com/forums/169401-azure-active-directory/suggestions/15493536-add-support-for-javascript-inside-the-custom-ui-br

    /Parakh

    Adrian Gawor supported this idea  · 
  20. 1,020 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    124 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Adrian Gawor supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base