This request is for custom domain and custom SSL certificate support for the IoT Hub endpoint. This work is currently unplanned for IoT Hub but we’re listing to customer requests and may chose to support this in the future.
If you have interest in have a deterministic way of understanding your IoT Hub IP address (and corresponding geo-pair IP address) in order to keep firewall rules up-to-date, see and vote on this request: https://feedback.azure.com/forums/321918-azure-iot/suggestions/15714243-iot-hub-network-address instead.
No response from Microsoft after 5 months.
The comments about using CNAME records do not work as there is SSL involved.
Thanks for your feedback here. We clearly understand that large DB size are desired by many. Today, one of the limiters here is the 99.99 SLA and ensuring that we can meet this for all DBs regardless of size.
This is a major limiting factor for us looking at Azure for new projects.
We need to store multiple terabytes of data and none of Azure's offering are even remotely cost effective.
We purchased & manage multiple HA 20 TB Sql Server setups for less than it would cost to run 2x1TB Azure Sql Databases for one month. And our performance is hundreds of times better then Azure Sql Databases.
I don't understand how Azure can consider their "offerings" even remotely decent or useful for anyone but the most basic of users. $6,000 a month for 1TB with performance that I would expect from a machine 20 years old is insulting.
You seriously need to up your game, **** even Amazon provide better performance and more capacity running SQL Server and its NOT EVEN THEIR PRODUCT!
126 votesstarted · AdminAzure IaaS Engineering Team (Azure IaaS Engineering Team, Microsoft, Microsoft Azure) responded
Startup times for VMs continues to be a focus in Azure. I am leaving this item in the “Started” state because we still have work to be done, but the current deployment time we are seeing for Windows Server on average is 2 minutes (1 minute for Linux). We’ll continue to invest resources in driving down this number.
Agreed. Azure is miles behind when it comes to performance. Nearly every other cloud provider (not just Google and Amazon) has VM startup times that are less than 60 seconds. While Azure is getting even slower, it now takes 8 minutes to start a small virtual machine.
If this continues we will be migrating all our services to AWS & Google, at least they are improving.
We have been considering all of the risks and investigating the steps required to ensure we implement this feature with high positive impact and low to no negative impact.
After this investigation we have decided we will enable Pay-As-You-Go customers the option to configure a spending limit on a Pay-As-You-Go subscription, with appropriate safeguards and measures to prevent both service abuse and production service failure.
We have not yet finished determining the details of what this feature will look like, nor do we have a timeline for release, but we have heard your voices and have added this feature to our backlog.
Thanks for your continued feedback,
-Adam (Azure Billing Team)
Over 4 years and still not implemented. Google and AWS have spending limits. Microsoft implement other "features" such as graphs and "better styling" but not one of the most requested features ever that has actual merits.
We are looking at options to enable this.