Arthur Blake

My feedback

  1. 624 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    unplanned  ·  40 comments  ·  SQL Server » Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Arthur Blake supported this idea  · 
  2. 14 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Arthur Blake commented  · 

    Agree. I was really surprised that taking care of index fragmentation this is a manual process in Azure SQL Database. How about automatic statistics maintenance as well?

    Arthur Blake supported this idea  · 
  3. 133 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    20 comments  ·  Virtual Machines » Windows  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Arthur Blake shared this idea  · 
  4. 12 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Lab Services  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We’ve got it added into the backlog, and it will be prioritized with other features. So we don’t have an ETA at this point of time. Meanwhile, if you could share with us what kind of naming you would like to use and why the default one doesn’t work, it will certainly help us with the right design. For anyone who wants to see it happens sooner, please don’t hesitate to vote for it.

    Arthur Blake commented  · 

    I find the randomly generated naming to be very confusing and avoid it wherever I can, especially as the number of resources under Azure grows, it's important to keep things uniform and simple. So I would like this feature as well.

    Arthur Blake supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base