Péter Juhász

My feedback

  1. 159 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    We’ve temporarily removed the Data retention UI while we fix a potential issue. I hope to have this re-enabled by the first week of October and will update the status here. Apologies for any inconvenience. Retention changes made previously are still in effect.

    Billing for additional retention is expected to start late in 2019.

    Please let me know if you have any questions.

    Dale Koetke
    dalek@microsoft.com

    Péter Juhász supported this idea  · 
  2. 159 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    12 comments  ·  SDK and Tools  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We are looking into this… is Visio the end goal here or just something that will help visualize the contents of the template/resource group?

    Péter Juhász supported this idea  · 
  3. 137 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Azure Search » Multi-tenancy  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Péter Juhász commented  · 

    It's cool that you do not need to proxy search queries through your web application, the clients can query the REST API directly. But at the moment, all query keys are global. Some of our indexes contain sensitive data, that we do not want to make available to anyone with a query key.

    Péter Juhász supported this idea  · 
  4. 217 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Additional Services  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Péter Juhász supported this idea  · 
  5. 181 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  7 comments  ·  Additional Services  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Péter Juhász supported this idea  · 
  6. 251 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Additional Services  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Péter Juhász supported this idea  · 
  7. 2,239 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    75 comments  ·  Storage » Blobs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your feedback. We are currently in public preview of static website hosting for Azure Storage to enable this scenario. Check out the blog post here for more details: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/azure-storage-static-web-hosting-public-preview. The feature set includes support for default documents and custom error documents for HTTP status code 404.

    For any further questions, or to discuss your specific scenario, send us an email at azurestoragefeedback@microsoft.com.

    Péter Juhász supported this idea  · 
  8. 984 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    48 comments  ·  Azure portal » Resource management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hey Folks,

    We have made some great progress on this idea and most of our services today do support move resources across groups.

    We are still working towards 100% support and while we do that it would be great if you can help us prioritize the missing services.

    Please file individual asks on each service category present in uservoice and vote for it.

    Thanks,
    Azure Portal Team

    Péter Juhász supported this idea  · 
  9. 229 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    21 comments  ·  Azure portal » Resource management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Péter Juhász supported this idea  · 
  10. 246 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    unplanned  ·  7 comments  ·  Azure Resource Manager  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Péter Juhász supported this idea  · 
  11. 1,070 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    26 comments  ·  Storage » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your feedback. We view this ask as a set of related features.

    Soft delete for blobs enables you to save and recover your data where blobs or blob snapshots are deleted. It does not protect against container or account deletion. This feature is currently generally available. You can see the announcement here: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/soft-delete-for-azure-storage-blobs-ga/ and the full documentation here: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/storage/blobs/storage-blob-soft-delete

    Object versioning will also offer object-level protection, and will offer a few incremental improvements to soft delete. Specifically, it will make recovery of deleted data easier. This feature is planned for the coming year.

    Container soft delete will protect against container-level deletion and modification. This feature is planned for the coming year as well.

    Native support for blob backup will protect against account-level deletion and modification, and is currently on our backlog.

    We will provide updates when they become available. For any further questions, or to discuss your…

    Péter Juhász supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base