Mike

My feedback

  1. 90 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    15 comments  ·  API Management » Pricing  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike supported this idea  · 
  2. 56 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure Functions » Runtime  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Headless Chrome requires some libraries to be installed that aren’t available in the containers we use in Linux consumption. You can, however, run your function app in a Docker container with the libraries installed. Custom containers are currently supported in the Premium and App Service plans. Take a look at this example from a community member of a Dockerfile with the dependencies: https://github.com/estruyf/azure-function-node-puppeteer/blob/master/Dockerfile

    - Anthony

    Mike supported this idea  · 
  3. 27 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Azure Search » Security  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike commented  · 

    Yes! Any update?

  4. 3,765 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    149 comments  ·  Networking » DNS  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  5. 27 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    9 comments  ·  Azure Container Instances  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike supported this idea  · 
  6. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Networking » Network Security Groups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike commented  · 

    This was announced at ignite.

  7. 229 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    16 comments  ·  Storage » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike supported this idea  · 
    Mike commented  · 

    This not existing is crazy.

  8. 17 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Storage » Storage Explorer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for you feedback. Currently we are in public preview of Azure Active Directory authentication for storage. This feature set allows you to use Azure’s role-based access control framework to grant specific permissions to users, groups and applications down to the scope of an individual blob container or queue. You can see the public preview announcement here: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/announcing-the-preview-of-aad-authentication-for-storage/

    For any further questions, or to discuss your specific scenario, send us an email at azurestoragefeedback@microsoft.com.

    Mike commented  · 

    How is this not a thing.

  9. 71 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    9 comments  ·  Networking » Network Watcher  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike commented  · 

    This is crazy. What enterprise customer has PCs and VNETs in the same RG?

    Mike supported this idea  · 
  10. 70 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  2 comments  ·  Networking » Virtual Network  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike commented  · 

    I can't agree more.

    Mike supported this idea  · 
  11. 122 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    8 comments  ·  Networking » IP addresses  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike commented  · 
  12. 47 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Networking » Virtual Network  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike commented  · 

    Hi. Any update? We are now into 2017. Thanks!

    Mike

  13. 2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  (General Feedback) » Availability  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike supported this idea  · 
  14. 23 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  (General Feedback) » Availability  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mike commented  · 

    If you want serious enterprise users of your cloud applications you need to support ALL services on VNETs only. Many enterprise customers don't have public facing apps, apis, etc. We can't use so many of your platform services because we can't limit them to our internal VNETs!

Feedback and Knowledge Base