Gordon

My feedback

  1. 19 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gordon supported this idea  · 
  2. 241 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    9 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gordon supported this idea  · 
  3. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure Active Directory » Access Reviews  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hi Gordon,

    Thanks for the detailed feedback! Yes we are working on adding both manager and sponsor groups as reviewers, will update here when we have a preview ready. In the mean time, if you have any more questions or more requirements, please let us know by commenting here!

    - Fionna

    Gordon commented  · 

    That's good news, thanks for update.

    Gordon shared this idea  · 
  4. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure Active Directory » Access Reviews  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hi Gordon!

    Thanks for the feedback! We are working on adding more triggers to kick off access reviews like what you listed in 1!

    For 2. we do show user’s sign-in data to the reviewers to help them make the decisions. If a user hasn’t signed in to the tenant in the last 30 days, then the system will recommend denying that user’s continued access. Are you referring to automatically triggering a review on users who have not accessed an app/resource in the last X days?

    - Fionna

    Gordon commented  · 

    Oh, I haven't read in detail for your 30 days haven't signed-in recommendation as denying feature. My original intention include "auto-deny" and "auto-review" both actually.

    Gordon shared this idea  · 
  5. 14 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » Access Reviews  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hi Justin, thanks for the feedback! It will definitely be helpful to have managers as the reviewers, there is a “manager” attribute in AAD’s user profile, but it’s currently a string only. We are working to improve the architecture first, then we can leverage the data to automatically assign managers to be reviewers. If you have any more feedback or questions on this, feel free to comment on this thread or email accessreviews@microsoft.com.

    Gordon commented  · 

    That will be awesome if supported Manager as reviewers.

  6. 2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gordon shared this idea  · 
  7. 15 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gordon supported this idea  · 
  8. 68 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gordon supported this idea  · 
    Gordon commented  · 

    Even not for background processing, any online query should set a reasonable DTU so that it will not letting any funky query impact others.

  9. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Cache  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gordon shared this idea  · 
  10. 148 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Cache » Azure Redis Cache  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gordon supported this idea  · 
  11. 28 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » SQL API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gordon supported this idea  · 
  12. 229 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    16 comments  ·  Storage » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Gordon commented  · 

    It must be supported, it has no point that failover is out of control on customer side.
    Failover is not only for the purpose of "Real Disaster" happens.

    Gordon supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base