Teppei Ishii
My feedback
-
104 votes
We are still under consideration for this feature. In the meanwhile, could you use Azure CDN to accomplish this?
Teppei Ishii
supported this idea
·
-
37 votes
-
9 votesTeppei Ishii
supported this idea
·
-
38 votesunder review · 0 comments · Networking » Application Gateway · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Teppei Ishii
supported this idea
·
-
33 votes
Thanks for the feedback, we are exploring options to solve this inconvinient when using default routes.
Unfortunatelly kms is not a single VIP globally, exploring options.
Teppei Ishii
supported this idea
·
-
28 votesTeppei Ishii
supported this idea
·
-
34 votesTeppei Ishii
supported this idea
·
-
14 votesTeppei Ishii
commented
I received the same feedback from other customers. They wondered unknown billing for the storage account even though they do not have any more data in it. It's few amount, but the customer sometimes need to explain what the cost for to their boss.
Eventually, they feel bad because they have never turned the diagnostic on, but it's charged.Teppei Ishii
supported this idea
·
-
26 votesTeppei Ishii
supported this idea
·
-
138 votesTeppei Ishii
supported this idea
·
-
8 votesTeppei Ishii
supported this idea
·
-
38 votes0 comments · Networking » Domain Name Service (DNS, Traffic Manager) · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Thanks for the suggestion, we’ll consider how we can best support failover/failback during ‘grey’ failures in future, including a manual failback option.
Teppei Ishii
supported this idea
·
-
139 votes5 comments · Networking » VPN Connectivity (Point-to-Site, Site-to-Site) · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Thank you for your patience. This is still under review. We are working on other features that are moving us closer to being able to provide these capabilities, but cannot yet dedicate resources to this feature.
Thanks,
Bridget [MSFT] -
25 votesTeppei Ishii
supported this idea
·
-
2,598 votes
Hi folks,
We have shipped a public preview of integration with AAD DS: https://azure.microsoft.com/blog/azure-active-directory-integration-for-smb-access-now-in-public-preview/
What we have in preview is a first step along a much larger roadmap for integration with AAD/AD for authentication and authorization. As the blog post says, this initial preview is really about Windows cloud VM access to the Azure file share with an AAD identity. Future refreshes to this feature will add non-Windows (Linux, macOS, etc) support, and the ability to mount the Azure file shares on-premises with your AAD identity. You can learn more about this in our Ignite session as well (at around 22:00): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMzh2M66E9o
We’ll keep you updated on our progress. In the meantime, don’t hesitate to continue posting feedback on this feature below.
Thanks,
Will Gries
Program Manager, Azure FilesTeppei Ishii
commented
+1
without ACL and quota, Azure Files is only for someone who owns & administors Azure Storage account. This cannot be truely the enterprise capable solution.Teppei Ishii
supported this idea
·
-
68 votes
-
74 votes2 comments · Networking » VPN Connectivity (Point-to-Site, Site-to-Site) · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Hi,
Thanks for the feedback. We do plan to improve the performance and scale of Azure VPN gateways. We will provide more updates once we have concrete plans and measurements.
Thanks,
Yushun [MSFT] -
16 votesTeppei Ishii
supported this idea
·
-
22 votesTeppei Ishii
supported this idea
·
I believe Application Gateway and Azure Storage integration is reasonable.
Currently Azure CDN cannot act as WAF to drop malicious traffic. In addition, we have better metrics & diagnostic logs for Application Gateway than Azure CDN.
There's no limit to achieving better security for users, so I appreciate if you consider that.
I personally tested AppGw and Azure Storage integrated great by setting "PickHostNameFromBackendAddress" on AppGw. We just do not have PG guarantee with this scenario.