Teppei Ishii

My feedback

  1. 121 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Networking » Network Watcher  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Teppei Ishii supported this idea  · 
  2. 58 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Networking » Virtual Network  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Teppei Ishii supported this idea  · 
  3. 145 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Teppei Ishii commented  · 

    I believe Application Gateway and Azure Storage integration is reasonable.

    Currently Azure CDN cannot act as WAF to drop malicious traffic. In addition, we have better metrics & diagnostic logs for Application Gateway than Azure CDN.

    There's no limit to achieving better security for users, so I appreciate if you consider that.
    I personally tested AppGw and Azure Storage integrated great by setting "PickHostNameFromBackendAddress" on AppGw. We just do not have PG guarantee with this scenario.

    Teppei Ishii supported this idea  · 
  4. 30 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for the valid suggestion. Your feedback is now open for the user community to upvote which allows us to effectively prioritize your request against our existing feature list and also gives us insight into the potential impact of implementing the suggested feature

  5. 10 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Storage » Storage Explorer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Teppei Ishii supported this idea  · 
  6. 51 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Networking » Application Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Teppei Ishii supported this idea  · 
  7. 38 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Networking » Virtual Network  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Teppei Ishii supported this idea  · 
  8. 33 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  (General Feedback) » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Teppei Ishii supported this idea  · 
  9. 35 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Support Feedback  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Teppei Ishii supported this idea  · 
  10. 14 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Storage » Managed Disk Storage  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Teppei Ishii commented  · 

    I received the same feedback from other customers. They wondered unknown billing for the storage account even though they do not have any more data in it. It's few amount, but the customer sometimes need to explain what the cost for to their boss.
    Eventually, they feel bad because they have never turned the diagnostic on, but it's charged.

    Teppei Ishii supported this idea  · 
  11. 27 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  (General Feedback) » Offers  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Teppei Ishii supported this idea  · 
  12. 7 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Support Feedback  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Teppei Ishii supported this idea  · 
  13. 138 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    12 comments  ·  Signup and Billing  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Teppei Ishii supported this idea  · 
  14. 8 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Virtual Machines  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Teppei Ishii supported this idea  · 
  15. 39 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Networking » DNS  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Teppei Ishii supported this idea  · 
  16. 191 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  Networking » VPN Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  17. 27 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Virtual Machines » Linux  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Teppei Ishii supported this idea  · 
  18. 3,141 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    124 comments  ·  Storage » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hi everyone,

    We recently announce the General Availability of Azure Active Directory Domain Services (Azure AD DS) authentication for Azure Files! By enabling integration with Azure AD DS, you can mount your Azure file share over SMB using Azure AD credentials from Azure AD DS domain joined Windows VMs with NTFS ACLs enforced. For more details, please refer to our blog post:http://aka.ms/azure-file-aadds-authentication-ga-blog.

    A part of the GA announcement, we shared the upcoming plan to extend the authentication support to Active Directory (AD) either hosted on-premises or in cloud. If you need an Azure Files solution with AD authentication today, you can consider installing Azure File Sync (AFS) on your Windows File Servers where AD integration is fully supported.

    If you are interested to hear future updates on Azure Files Active Directory Authentication, please complete this sign-up survey:https://aka.ms/AzureFilesADAuthPreviewSurvey.

    Thanks,
    Azure Files Team

    Teppei Ishii commented  · 

    +1
    without ACL and quota, Azure Files is only for someone who owns & administors Azure Storage account. This cannot be truely the enterprise capable solution.

    Teppei Ishii supported this idea  · 
  19. 69 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  2 comments  ·  Networking » Network Security Groups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  20. 77 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Networking » VPN Gateway  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base