Development for this feature is in progress. Expected to launch by Jan 2020.
We’re currently looking into offering these.
Stay tuned for updates,
We are still under consideration for this feature. In the meanwhile, could you use Azure CDN to accomplish this?
I believe Application Gateway and Azure Storage integration is reasonable.
Currently Azure CDN cannot act as WAF to drop malicious traffic. In addition, we have better metrics & diagnostic logs for Application Gateway than Azure CDN.
There's no limit to achieving better security for users, so I appreciate if you consider that.
I personally tested AppGw and Azure Storage integrated great by setting "PickHostNameFromBackendAddress" on AppGw. We just do not have PG guarantee with this scenario.
Thanks for the valid suggestion. Your feedback is now open for the user community to upvote which allows us to effectively prioritize your request against our existing feature list and also gives us insight into the potential impact of implementing the suggested feature
51 votesunder review · 0 comments · Networking » Application Gateway · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Thanks for the feedback, we are exploring options to solve this inconvinient when using default routes.
Unfortunatelly kms is not a single VIP globally, exploring options.
I received the same feedback from other customers. They wondered unknown billing for the storage account even though they do not have any more data in it. It's few amount, but the customer sometimes need to explain what the cost for to their boss.
Eventually, they feel bad because they have never turned the diagnostic on, but it's charged.
We are planning to add “title” and sort functionality to support requests page.
Thanks for the feedback and suggestion!
Thanks for the suggestion, we’ll consider how we can best support failover/failback during ‘grey’ failures in future, including a manual failback option.
Thank you for your patience. This is still under review. We are working on other features that are moving us closer to being able to provide these capabilities, but cannot yet dedicate resources to this feature.
We recently announce the General Availability of Azure Active Directory Domain Services (Azure AD DS) authentication for Azure Files! By enabling integration with Azure AD DS, you can mount your Azure file share over SMB using Azure AD credentials from Azure AD DS domain joined Windows VMs with NTFS ACLs enforced. For more details, please refer to our blog post:http://aka.ms/azure-file-aadds-authentication-ga-blog.
A part of the GA announcement, we shared the upcoming plan to extend the authentication support to Active Directory (AD) either hosted on-premises or in cloud. If you need an Azure Files solution with AD authentication today, you can consider installing Azure File Sync (AFS) on your Windows File Servers where AD integration is fully supported.
If you are interested to hear future updates on Azure Files Active Directory Authentication, please complete this sign-up survey:https://aka.ms/AzureFilesADAuthPreviewSurvey.
Azure Files Team
without ACL and quota, Azure Files is only for someone who owns & administors Azure Storage account. This cannot be truely the enterprise capable solution.
Thanks for the feedback. We do plan to improve the performance and scale of Azure VPN gateways. We will provide more updates once we have concrete plans and measurements.