John Wyler

My feedback

  1. 1,294 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    21 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » SDK  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We recently released support for client-side transactions in our .NET SDK.

    https://devblogs.microsoft.com/cosmosdb/introducing-transactionalbatch-in-the-net-sdk/

    We would like to get your feedback on this to understand if this meets your needs for transaction support. Please read our announcement and/or feel free to try our new support then please respond to this one question survey.

    https://forms.office.com/Pages/ResponsePage.aspx?id=v4j5cvGGr0GRqy180BHbR_Lrg0nxRBtErN-GyphxUs9UQ0c1STlJTDVOT1JXUzhYVkYzU1JZSU5BTi4u

    Thank you.

    John Wyler supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    John Wyler commented  · 

    Why is the team not implementing this feature? I’d rather write client side code and execute it on the server than write JS stored procs. We need transaction support in .NET.

  2. 922 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    9 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    There are multiple responses to this suggestion.

    Support for SQL-like syntax for UPDATE, DELETE and INSERT INTO are not on our road map at this time.

    However, the underlying functionality for an UPDATE, SET is essentially a PATCH. This functionality we are actively working on. See this User Voice item here to track for future updates. https://feedback.azure.com/forums/263030-azure-cosmos-db/suggestions/6693091-be-able-to-do-partial-updates-on-document

    Thank you for your suggestion.

    John Wyler supported this idea  · 
  3. 1,398 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    84 comments  ·  Storage » Tables  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    John Wyler commented  · 

    There is no way I'm using ATS without its support for global and local secondary indices. It appears neither SQL Azure nor Table Storage is suitable for big data applications. DynamoDB it is!

    John Wyler supported this idea  · 
  4. 3,041 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    187 comments  ·  Signup and Billing  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Quick update,

    We have been considering all of the risks and investigating the steps required to ensure we implement this feature with high positive impact and low to no negative impact.

    After this investigation we have decided we will enable Pay-As-You-Go customers the option to configure a spending limit on a Pay-As-You-Go subscription, with appropriate safeguards and measures to prevent both service abuse and production service failure.

    We have not yet finished determining the details of what this feature will look like, nor do we have a timeline for release, but we have heard your voices and have added this feature to our backlog.

    Thanks for your continued feedback,

    -Adam (Azure Billing Team)

    John Wyler supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base