Bryan Brinegar

My feedback

  1. 2,943 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    121 comments  ·  Storage » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hi folks,

    We have shipped a public preview of integration with AAD DS: https://azure.microsoft.com/blog/azure-active-directory-integration-for-smb-access-now-in-public-preview/

    What we have in preview is a first step along a much larger roadmap for integration with AAD/AD for authentication and authorization. As the blog post says, this initial preview is really about Windows cloud VM access to the Azure file share with an AAD identity. Future refreshes to this feature will add non-Windows (Linux, macOS, etc) support, and the ability to mount the Azure file shares on-premises with your AAD identity. You can learn more about this in our Ignite session as well (at around 22:00): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMzh2M66E9o

    We’ll keep you updated on our progress. In the meantime, don’t hesitate to continue posting feedback on this feature below.

    Thanks,

    Will Gries
    Program Manager, Azure Files

    Bryan Brinegar commented  · 

    We've been waiting for a solution to mount Azure file shares on-premises with our AAD identity. This is a key feature that's preventing us from migrating more workloads to Azure. An update would be appreciated.

    Bryan Brinegar supported this idea  · 
    Bryan Brinegar commented  · 

    Any timeline?

  2. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  Azure Maps » Feature requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bryan Brinegar supported this idea  · 
  3. 9 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Azure Active Directory » End user experiences  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bryan Brinegar supported this idea  · 
  4. 90 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Bryan Brinegar supported this idea  · 
  5. 36 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    11 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    It is possible to add multiple reply URLs within the same domain, unfortunately the experience is a bit clunky and we’re working on fixing this.

    At this time, in order to achieve this a setup with client1.domain.com and client2.domain.com as redirect URIs, you must first add the overarching domain as a redirect URI and then add the sub-domains, like so:

    1) https://domain.com
    2) https://client1.domain.com
    3) https://client2.domain.com

    Check out this article for more info:
    https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/active-directory-v2-limitations#restrictions-on-redirect-uris

    Bryan Brinegar supported this idea  · 
  6. 287 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    36 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bryan Brinegar supported this idea  · 
  7. 313 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    64 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Just to provide an update, we are close to launching a private preview. We are in the final testing stages for this feature. We will have another update in the next few weeks with instructions on how to join the private preview.

    Bryan Brinegar supported this idea  · 
  8. 362 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    61 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bryan Brinegar supported this idea  · 
  9. 542 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    64 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Due to various technical limitations, the first iteration of the customer-owned domains functionality will not be available for a few more months. We will provide an update as soon as we can get a more specific ETA.

    If you are looking to use custom domains to use javascript, we are now looking to enable that experience by providing a new (non-customizable) domain. Please look for updates here: https://feedback.azure.com/forums/169401-azure-active-directory/suggestions/15493536-add-support-for-javascript-inside-the-custom-ui-br

    /Parakh

    Bryan Brinegar supported this idea  · 
  10. 355 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bryan Brinegar supported this idea  · 
  11. 203 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bryan Brinegar supported this idea  · 
  12. 3,668 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    74 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » SQL API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bryan Brinegar supported this idea  · 
  13. 33 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Functions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bryan Brinegar supported this idea  · 
  14. 82 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Storage » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bryan Brinegar supported this idea  · 
  15. 139 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Storage » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bryan Brinegar supported this idea  · 
  16. 87 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Storage » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bryan Brinegar supported this idea  · 
  17. 351 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Bryan Brinegar supported this idea  · 
  18. 1,187 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Folks,

    Thanks for the questions and suggestions. And apologies for not sharing any update on this thread for so long. We’ve been working on this problem and have announced changes on our official team blog (see here: https://cloudblogs.microsoft.com/enterprisemobility/2016/09/15/cleaning-up-the-azure-ad-and-microsoft-account-overlap/).

    First, we are acutely aware of the UX pain this is causing and we are sorry for this. We are trying to undo a decade and a half of systems divergence. There are literally hundreds of different engineering teams across Microsoft involved in this effort. So this is taking time.

    Second, we can’t easily “merge” two accounts, or allow IT to “take over” personal Microsoft accounts. There are two main hurdles: (1) The terms of service are fundamentally different for the two account types and (2) they are based on different technologies with different stacks (different identifiers, SDKs, token formats, etc.). We’re working to converge the two stacks but again this…

    Bryan Brinegar supported this idea  · 
  19. 1,099 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    74 comments  ·  Azure portal » Resource management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hey Folks,

    We have made some great progress on this idea and most of our services today do support move resources across groups.

    We are still working towards 100% support and while we do that it would be great if you can help us prioritize the missing services.

    Please file individual asks on each service category present in uservoice and vote for it.

    Thanks,
    Azure Portal Team

    Bryan Brinegar supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base