Bryan Brinegar

My feedback

  1. 3,057 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    125 comments  ·  Storage » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hi everyone,

    We recently announce the General Availability of Azure Active Directory Domain Services (Azure AD DS) authentication for Azure Files! By enabling integration with Azure AD DS, you can mount your Azure file share over SMB using Azure AD credentials from Azure AD DS domain joined Windows VMs with NTFS ACLs enforced. For more details, please refer to our blog post:http://aka.ms/azure-file-aadds-authentication-ga-blog.

    A part of the GA announcement, we shared the upcoming plan to extend the authentication support to Active Directory (AD) either hosted on-premises or in cloud. If you need an Azure Files solution with AD authentication today, you can consider installing Azure File Sync (AFS) on your Windows File Servers where AD integration is fully supported.

    If you are interested to hear future updates on Azure Files Active Directory Authentication, please complete this sign-up survey:https://aka.ms/AzureFilesADAuthPreviewSurvey.

    Thanks,
    Azure Files Team

    Bryan Brinegar commented  · 

    We've been waiting for a solution to mount Azure file shares on-premises with our AAD identity. This is a key feature that's preventing us from migrating more workloads to Azure. An update would be appreciated.

    Bryan Brinegar supported this idea  · 
    Bryan Brinegar commented  · 

    Any timeline?

  2. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  Azure Maps » Feature requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bryan Brinegar supported this idea  · 
  3. 14 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » End user experiences  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bryan Brinegar supported this idea  · 
  4. 104 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Bryan Brinegar supported this idea  · 
  5. 38 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    12 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    It is possible to add multiple reply URLs within the same domain, unfortunately the experience is a bit clunky and we’re working on fixing this.

    At this time, in order to achieve this a setup with client1.domain.com and client2.domain.com as redirect URIs, you must first add the overarching domain as a redirect URI and then add the sub-domains, like so:

    1) https://domain.com
    2) https://client1.domain.com
    3) https://client2.domain.com

    Check out this article for more info:
    https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/active-directory-v2-limitations#restrictions-on-redirect-uris

    Bryan Brinegar supported this idea  · 
  6. 297 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    35 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bryan Brinegar supported this idea  · 
  7. 322 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    64 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Just to provide an update, we are close to launching a private preview. We are in the final testing stages for this feature. We will have another update in the next few weeks with instructions on how to join the private preview.

    Bryan Brinegar supported this idea  · 
  8. 377 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    61 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bryan Brinegar supported this idea  · 
  9. 606 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    72 comments  ·  Azure Active Directory » B2C  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Due to various technical limitations, the first iteration of the customer-owned domains functionality will not be available for a few more months. We will provide an update as soon as we can get a more specific ETA.

    If you are looking to use custom domains to use javascript, we are now looking to enable that experience by providing a new (non-customizable) domain. Please look for updates here: https://feedback.azure.com/forums/169401-azure-active-directory/suggestions/15493536-add-support-for-javascript-inside-the-custom-ui-br

    /Parakh

    Bryan Brinegar supported this idea  · 
  10. 448 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    10 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bryan Brinegar supported this idea  · 
  11. 244 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    9 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bryan Brinegar supported this idea  · 
  12. 4,015 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    84 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » SQL API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bryan Brinegar supported this idea  · 
  13. 33 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Azure Functions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bryan Brinegar supported this idea  · 
  14. 99 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Storage » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bryan Brinegar supported this idea  · 
  15. 191 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Storage » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bryan Brinegar supported this idea  · 
  16. 111 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Storage » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bryan Brinegar supported this idea  · 
  17. 423 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Bryan Brinegar supported this idea  · 
  18. 1,219 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Folks,

    Thanks for the questions and suggestions. And apologies for not sharing any update on this thread for so long. We’ve been working on this problem and have announced changes on our official team blog (see here: https://cloudblogs.microsoft.com/enterprisemobility/2016/09/15/cleaning-up-the-azure-ad-and-microsoft-account-overlap/).

    First, we are acutely aware of the UX pain this is causing and we are sorry for this. We are trying to undo a decade and a half of systems divergence. There are literally hundreds of different engineering teams across Microsoft involved in this effort. So this is taking time.

    Second, we can’t easily “merge” two accounts, or allow IT to “take over” personal Microsoft accounts. There are two main hurdles: (1) The terms of service are fundamentally different for the two account types and (2) they are based on different technologies with different stacks (different identifiers, SDKs, token formats, etc.). We’re working to converge the two stacks but again this…

    Bryan Brinegar supported this idea  · 
  19. 1,107 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    74 comments  ·  Azure portal » Resource management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hey Folks,

    We have made some great progress on this idea and most of our services today do support move resources across groups.

    We are still working towards 100% support and while we do that it would be great if you can help us prioritize the missing services.

    Please file individual asks on each service category present in uservoice and vote for it.

    Thanks,
    Azure Portal Team

    Bryan Brinegar supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base