Thank you for the feedback. We are working on prereqs to make this possible. Not in scope for CY2019.
As per the others - we now cannot create a large virtual machine scale set, without having to get hundreds of clients to add new IP address to firewall.
This is a huge oversight.
Azure tools even has the command for it, it just doesn't work:
az network public-ip update -g "RG" -n TEST_SKU_CHANGE --sku Standard
It would be great to be able to use Azure B2c and Azure API management not just at premium tier. You are crippling the product for us that simply can't justify GBP2800 p/m for the API management. Surely the overheads can't be the much more on the basic tier if there is a low usage footprint.
Its one of the only Azure services where you cripple functionality in what appears to be an attempt to get people to the highest level. Most other items are on a consumption based modelling.
Hopefully you see the folly in this.
3 votesAndrew Thomas shared this idea ·
Any update on this?
You can now use the Azure CDN to access blobs with custom domains over HTTPS. See the following article for instructions on how to do so: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/storage/storage-https-custom-domain-cdn. Having talked to a number of customers, we concluded that this solution addresses many scenarios where the need for HTTPS access to blobs with custom domains exists.
Native Azure Storage support for using SSL to access blobs at custom domains is still on our backlog. We would love to hear about your scenarios where using the Azure CDN is not an acceptable solution, either by posting on this thread or sending us an email at firstname.lastname@example.org.
We definitely recognize the popularity of this feature, and we discuss it constantly during the planning phases. However there are certain technical limitations in the system that add a large amount of development cost. Because of the cost and the fact that there is a workaround available, other features get prioritized over this one.
That being said, please keep voting for it. The popularity of the feature does help bring it up and makes us reconsider every time.
Apologies for the delay.
We’re doing some research both on the specifics of this ask as well as what it would take to support this.
Is the ask here to do the same thing that regular Azure AD does (see: https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/enterprisemobility/2014/12/18/azure-active-directory-now-with-group-claims-and-application-roles/) or is are there different requirements around this for Azure AD B2C?