Andrei Pacurariu

My feedback

  1. 344 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Service Bus  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrei Pacurariu supported this idea  · 
  2. 1,152 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    103 comments  ·  Signup and Billing  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for the post , votes, and comments. We are aware of this limitation and are targeting sometime next year to improve this experience. In the meantime you can sign up for a new account in your desired country and transfer your assets to the new account via Support.

    -Azure Billing Team

    Andrei Pacurariu supported this idea  · 
  3. 90 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Azure Functions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrei Pacurariu supported this idea  · 
  4. 1,294 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    21 comments  ·  Azure Cosmos DB » SDK  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We recently released support for client-side transactions in our .NET SDK.

    https://devblogs.microsoft.com/cosmosdb/introducing-transactionalbatch-in-the-net-sdk/

    We would like to get your feedback on this to understand if this meets your needs for transaction support. Please read our announcement and/or feel free to try our new support then please respond to this one question survey.

    https://forms.office.com/Pages/ResponsePage.aspx?id=v4j5cvGGr0GRqy180BHbR_Lrg0nxRBtErN-GyphxUs9UQ0c1STlJTDVOT1JXUzhYVkYzU1JZSU5BTi4u

    Thank you.

    Andrei Pacurariu supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Andrei Pacurariu commented  · 

    There is a duplicate idea asking for the same thing which is more popular so rather than duplicating it here with a few votes we should probably move our votes to the more visible idea - https://feedback.azure.com/forums/263030-documentdb/suggestions/16380400-allow-client-side-transactions-e-g-transactionsco

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Andrei Pacurariu commented  · 

    Transaction isolation (like Snapshot for optimistic concurrency) notwithstanding the ability to have a client-side initiated Unit of Work is very important. Currently Document DB supports transactions for the purpose of affecting multiple documents in the same collection in a unit of work all or nothing fashion only via server-side stored procedures. I completely support the ability to initiate the same behavior from the client-side with the same level of isolation that Document DB stored procedures would offer! Basically, we need client-side initiated transactions for documents in the same collection.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Andrei Pacurariu commented  · 

    It's great that we can have ACID transactions across multiple documents in the same collection via stored procedures and triggers but it would be even better if we could have the same behavior using client-side transactions such as TransactionScope. Having part of the logic running in JavaScript on the database makes it harder to maintain and subject to a unify unit testing and source control strategy, etc.

  5. 9 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  SQL Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Andrei Pacurariu commented  · 

    A similar level of customization as offered by DocumentDB where you can customize DB size and performance level would be great for SQL Database as well!

    Andrei Pacurariu supported this idea  · 
  6. 67 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Cloud Services (Web and Worker Role)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrei Pacurariu supported this idea  · 
  7. 43 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  3 comments  ·  Cloud Services (Web and Worker Role)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrei Pacurariu supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base