nrod

My feedback

  1. 26 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Networking » Content Delivery Network  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    nrod supported this idea  · 
  2. 31 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Networking » Content Delivery Network  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    nrod supported this idea  · 
  3. 139 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    8 comments  ·  Networking » Content Delivery Network  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    nrod supported this idea  · 
  4. 10 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Networking » Content Delivery Network  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    nrod commented  · 

    Hi Matt... I am exactly where you are on your text above... I also agree with you and I think it is totally weird that the situation is as it is... and almost a year later.
    So... I would like to know what is the solution... what Origin header value did you place on that field?
    Will I be lucky to get an answer from you? Are you going to see this? Worth a shot!
    Thank you in advance!
    Nuno

    nrod supported this idea  · 
  5. 1,140 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  33 comments  ·  Logic Apps » Connectors  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    nrod commented  · 

    Triggers for Azure FIle Storage are of paramount importance! Please put it in your development roadmap.

  6. 161 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Cloud Services (Web and Worker Role)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    nrod commented  · 

    This was already checked in the past and as of today (23.01.2017), this is correctly handled in all my domains. This can be ignored or deleted...

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    nrod commented  · 

    Today I checked my websites, hosted as Cloud Services, and to my surprise the SSL Labs Grade is now an A. Last time I checked it was a B (allowing RC4) and it was the reason to create this feedback idea.

    Now... what happened recently? Something changed in SSL Labs analysis tool? Something changed in Azure Cloud Services?

    Nevertheless, it does seem that this idea is no longer valid.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    nrod commented  · 

    @Anonymous, I appreciate your comment and insight over this situation but then why do Azure Web Apps and API Apps have this RC4 disabled by default? Aren't old browsers allowed to browse sites hosted as Web Apps or APIs hosted as API Apps?

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    nrod commented  · 

    Erratum - Read instead: Some of these levels are setup in the server hosting the application so they are not SSL dependent.

    UPDATE: The goal is to ask this setting to be part of a Cloud Service and prevent each developer from recurring to solutions such as https://azure.microsoft.com/en-gb/blog/how-to-disable-ssl-3-0-in-azure-websites-roles-and-virtual-machines/ and http://stackoverflow.com/questions/29777559/how-to-disable-rc4-cipher-on-azure-web-roles to have the RC4 disabled.

    nrod shared this idea  · 
  7. 289 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    8 comments  ·  Cloud Services (Web and Worker Role)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  8. 1,214 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    57 comments  ·  Cloud Services (Web and Worker Role)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Windows Azure Websites offers the ability to have smaller deployed websites. The ability to have multiple roles on a single VM instance is still in planning.

    nrod supported this idea  · 
  9. 47 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Cloud Services (Web and Worker Role)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    nrod supported this idea  · 
  10. 415 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    8 comments  ·  Cloud Services (Web and Worker Role)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    nrod supported this idea  · 
  11. 380 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    unplanned  ·  38 comments  ·  Azure portal » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    nrod supported this idea  · 
  12. 1,155 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Microsoft
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    75 comments  ·  Azure portal » Resource management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hey Folks,

    We have made some great progress on this idea and most of our services today do support move resources across groups.

    We are still working towards 100% support and while we do that it would be great if you can help us prioritize the missing services.

    Please file individual asks on each service category present in uservoice and vote for it.

    Thanks,
    Azure Portal Team

    nrod supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base